Both agents stopped reading on 2026-08-27 and had read nothing since:
k8s-1 at 12:15:41Z, k8s-2 at 19:14:27Z, each frozen at its line count
(35449 and 29917) while Traefik kept logging normally.
Each had hit its first kubelet log rotation after starting. The paths
under /var/log/containers are symlinks into /var/log/pods, and kubelet
rotates the target at containerLogMaxSize; the inotify tailer reopens
the path, waits for a file that is already present, and never returns.
Nothing about the result looks broken: pods Running and Ready, LAPI
answering, bouncers pulling, cumulative counters still showing large
numbers. The only symptom is that no scenario fires again, which reads
as quiet rather than blind.
So this was not a one-off. Rotation happens roughly every eight hours
here, and the agents die on the first one after every start, which
bounds local detection to a few hours at a time.
CrowdSec diagnoses this itself and names the fix, at agent startup:
File /var/log/containers/traefik-...log is a symlink, but inotify
polling is enabled. Crowdsec will not be able to detect rotation.
Consider setting poll_without_inotify to true in your configuration
Upstream carries the identical case as crowdsec#2449 (k3s + Traefik),
and the chart gained this field in helm-charts#109 to fix it. It does
not conflict with the force_inotify: true the chart hardcodes: that
governs the fsnotify watch on the directory, used to discover the log
of a replacement Traefik pod, while this governs how an already
discovered file is read. Verified by rendering the chart.
The acquisition ConfigMap is checksummed into the agent pod template,
so this rolls the DaemonSet and the stalled agents restart with it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Four Paperless requests overlapped and all four died:
decode: failed to find free space in the KV cache
srv decode: Context size has been exceeded.
They wanted 6209, 6472, 4303 and 1271 tokens from a shared pool of
16384. Auto slot count opens four of them and is also what enables
--kv-unified, so they draw on one buffer rather than a quarter each --
generous for a single caller, and impossible for four.
They overlapped because a client timeout does not stop the generation
behind it. The eval abandons a request after 300 s and moves to the next
document; the abandoned one keeps consuming the budget the next one
needs, and one slow document is enough to start the pile-up. With one
slot they queue instead, which is what should happen: nothing calls this
server in parallel on purpose, and Paperless's celery worker runs at
concurrency 1.
Deliberately no liveness probe alongside this. /health answered 200 in
0.4 ms throughout, which looks like the probe failing at its job -- but
the server drained the batch and served again by itself, so a probe that
restarted the pod would have turned a self-healing incident into an
outage. With a single slot, a probe asking for a real completion would
also queue behind live work and kill healthy pods mid-document.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
#767 broke the model. Asked to classify a document and answer with JSON
only, the server returned 1025 tokens of "!" against a 650-token prompt.
That is the KV cache emitting numbers rather than language, and it takes
everything downstream with it: Paperless ran past its 300 s timeout on
every document, Home Assistant got an empty completion once and a
hallucinated list of devices that do not exist another time.
None of that looked like a backend fault from the outside. The server
starts, /props reports the requested size, /health passes, and the
OpenAI response is well-formed with finish_reason "stop". Only the
generated text gives it away, which is why three separate symptoms got
blamed on prompt size, on tokenizer behaviour and on the RAG context
before anyone read the output.
The boundary is between the two changes rather than at either: #765 left
16384 per slot and produced coherent answers; #767 raised it to 32768 and
produced this. The same Vulkan/Mesa stack already fails at --ubatch-size
2048 with ErrorDeviceLost, so a ceiling here is not a surprise -- only
that it degrades quietly instead of erroring.
--parallel goes with it. Unset, slots return to auto, which is what keeps
--kv-unified enabled ("if number of slots is auto"), so the auto slots
share one buffer and each may draw the full 16384.
Home Assistant needed 18910 tokens for one Assist request and cannot have
them at this ceiling. That path is closed, and Paperless -- which fits in
16k and never needed more -- is what this restores.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
proxy-2 has been enforcing since 14:21:54 without incident, so the role
default moves to nftables and the host_vars override goes away rather than
being duplicated for proxy-1. proxy-2's rendered config is unchanged by this,
so it will not restart; only proxy-1 does.
The staged rollout did its job and can be read off the deploy log:
proxy-1: deployed in mode "dry-run"
proxy-2: deployed in mode "nftables"
and only proxy-2 restarted, which showed up as a 1,887,882-byte startup pull
from its address alone.
The delivery path was tested in enforcing mode with a decision on 192.0.2.1
(TEST-NET-1): both hosts had the ban 3s later as a 205-byte delta, and the
revocation as a 203-byte delta 1-2s after deletion.
What is still not proven is that a packet is actually dropped, and the
measurement for that argues for finishing the rollout rather than waiting.
Requests from banned addresses reaching Traefik stopped after proxy-2 armed —
1 at 14:02, 3 at 14:07, 22 at 14:08, 1 at 14:18, none after — but 25 of those
27 arrived in a single burst beforehand, so at this volume that is consistent
with enforcement rather than evidence of it. With both hosts armed the claim
becomes falsifiable instead: no request from an address in the decision set
should reach Traefik at all, and a single one would prove otherwise.
dry-run remains available per host through inventory/host_vars, which is what
a newly added proxy should get before it enforces.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Arming the bouncer on proxy-2 (#766) merged and deployed nothing. The switch
lives in ansible/inventory/host_vars/proxy-2.renner.uno.yml, and the trigger
list covered ansible/roles/** and the play but no inventory path at all. The
change sat in git looking applied while the host kept running dry-run, and
nothing reported a problem — there was simply no pipeline run to fail.
The bouncer's LAPI key has the same shape: it lives in
group_vars/netbird_proxy/vault.yml, so a rotation would never have reached the
hosts either.
Both paths are now listed. pve_hosts.yml deliberately is not: it is the single
inventory file for the whole fleet, so listing it would redeploy the proxies
for any unrelated host edit. The cost is that a change to [netbird_proxy] group
membership needs a manual deployment run.
Merging this triggers the run itself, since .woodpecker/deploy-netbird-proxy.yml
is in its own trigger list — so the arming from #766 applies with it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
First host goes from dry-run to enforcing. proxy-2 deliberately: it is the
dual-stack member, while proxy-1 is IPv6-only and the one where every
network-shaped problem has surfaced first — the dhcpcd/resolv.conf breakage,
and a GitHub download that could not work at all. host_vars keeps the change
to one host; proxy-1 stays on the role default.
Verified before committing: ansible-inventory resolves nftables for proxy-2
and nothing for proxy-1.
Adds netbird.renner.uno to capi_whitelists first, and that is not decoration.
The bouncer's chain sits on the INPUT hook, the proxy hosts run no other
firewall, and there is therefore no conntrack rule accepting established flows
ahead of it. A ban on the management address would drop the return traffic of
the proxies' own outbound control connection and take them off the mesh, with
no inbound attack involved at all. The same reasoning already covers the proxy
addresses, which were listed from the start.
Checked at the time of writing: none of these addresses appear in the current
decision set — searched all ~15k entries. That is the state today, not a
guarantee; they are rented addresses on a hoster whose ranges do end up on
community blocklists, which is the whole reason for listing them.
The delivery path was tested end to end beforehand with a decision on
192.0.2.1 (TEST-NET-1, so no real traffic could be affected). Both bouncers
received the ban within one poll cycle — a 206-byte delta against the usual
26 — and the revocation the same way, 203 bytes, ~5s after deletion. What that
did not test is whether a packet is actually dropped, which dry-run cannot
show. This commit is what makes that testable.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-02 16:13:11 +02:00
5 changed files with 104 additions and 29 deletions
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.