Compare commits

..
Author SHA1 Message Date
issue-fix-bot e0a00f6b05 fix: [alert] KubeHpaMaxedOut (authentik) (#761)
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci-manifests-test Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci-scripts-test Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/pr-review Pipeline was successful
2026-09-02 13:45:55 +00:00
3 changed files with 17 additions and 28 deletions
+13 -2
View File
@@ -120,7 +120,14 @@ spec:
server:
resources:
requests:
cpu: 200m
# 500m, not 200m: the HPA below targets 70% of *this* request, so at
# 200m the scale-up threshold sat at 140m — below the pod's own
# ordinary peak. Measured over 7d, a warm server pod p99s at ~108m
# and peaks at ~190m, and a freshly-started one burns ~300m booting
# Django. That made the HPA oscillate 2<->3<->4 all day and pin at
# maxReplicas (KubeHpaMaxedOut, issue #761). At 500m the threshold
# is 350m/pod, above the boot burst, so only real load scales out.
cpu: 500m
memory: 1Gi
limits:
memory: 2Gi
@@ -154,7 +161,11 @@ spec:
worker:
resources:
requests:
cpu: 200m
# Same reasoning as server above, and the worker is burstier still:
# over 7d its per-pod p99 reaches ~336m and peaks hit ~630m while
# running blueprint applies and scheduled tasks. 200m understated
# that badly enough that routine task batches read as saturation.
cpu: 500m
memory: 1Gi
limits:
memory: 2Gi
@@ -108,24 +108,6 @@ spec:
lapi:
replicas: 1
service:
# Backend wiring for the public LAPI Ingress (lapi-ingress.yaml).
#
# These belong on the SERVICE, not on the Ingress: under the Kubernetes
# Ingress provider `traefik.ingress.kubernetes.io/service.*` are service
# annotations, and on an Ingress they are silently ignored. The symptom
# is Traefik speaking plaintext to a TLS-only backend, which the LAPI
# answers with "Client sent an HTTP request to an HTTPS server." and a
# 400 — an error that looks like a malformed request rather than a
# scheme mismatch.
#
# With tls.enabled the LAPI serves HTTPS on 8080 and offers no
# plaintext port, so https here is mandatory rather than a hardening
# choice. The ServersTransport carries the chart's own CA, since that
# certificate is self-signed.
annotations:
traefik.ingress.kubernetes.io/service.serversscheme: https
traefik.ingress.kubernetes.io/service.serverstransport: crowdsec-crowdsec-lapi@kubernetescrd
# Far below the chart default, which reserves half a core per LAPI for a
# workload that draws single-digit millicores — enough to leave the
# cluster unschedulable with one node out. Only the reservation shrinks;
@@ -44,8 +44,8 @@ metadata:
namespace: crowdsec
spec:
serverName: crowdsec-service.crowdsec.svc.cluster.local
rootCAs:
- secret: crowdsec-root-secret
rootCAsSecrets:
- crowdsec-root-secret
---
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: Ingress
@@ -60,12 +60,8 @@ metadata:
cert-manager.io/cluster-issuer: letsencrypt-cluster
# NOT behind the Authentik gate: the client is a daemon with an API key,
# not a browser that can complete an OIDC flow.
#
# The backend scheme and ServersTransport are NOT set here. Under the
# Kubernetes Ingress provider, `traefik.ingress.kubernetes.io/service.*`
# are SERVICE annotations — on an Ingress they are silently ignored, and
# Traefik then talks plaintext to a TLS-only backend. They live on the
# chart's Service instead, via lapi.service.annotations in helmrelease.yaml.
traefik.ingress.kubernetes.io/service.serversscheme: https
traefik.ingress.kubernetes.io/service.serverstransport: crowdsec-crowdsec-lapi@kubernetescrd
spec:
ingressClassName: traefik
rules: