Compare commits

...
Author SHA1 Message Date
issue-fix-bot 205d7835c3 fix: [alert] VeleroBackupFailed (velero) (#657)
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci-manifests-test Pipeline is pending
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci-scripts-test Pipeline is pending
ci/woodpecker/pr/pr-review Pipeline is pending
2026-08-27 07:46:20 +00:00
k.renner 5f8c0115b5 Merge pull request 'fix(monitoring): raise VeleroBackupStale from 30h to 60h' (#658) from velero-stale-60h into master
ci/woodpecker/cron/issue-fix Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/cron/alert-monitor Pipeline was successful
Reviewed-on: k.renner/homelab#658
2026-08-27 07:36:12 +00:00
claude-botandClaude Opus 5 e2f3d67f79 fix(monitoring): raise VeleroBackupStale from 30h to 60h
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci-manifests-test Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci-scripts-test Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/pr-review Pipeline was successful
At 30h a single missed cycle pages critical, and a single missed cycle is the
normal cost of touching the nodes. Velero moves data through pods, so draining
a node kills whatever upload is in flight and the schedule is lost for that day
— it is not retried. Backup windows run 03:15 to 08:45 UTC, so any rolling node
work overlapping them produced a guaranteed critical alert per affected
schedule.

That is noise about planned work, not signal about backups. It fired for eleven
schedules during the bare-metal Talos upgrade and again today.

60h still catches what the rule exists for. Two consecutive failures is no
longer explicable by one maintenance window. Nothing is hidden in the meantime:
VeleroBackupFailed fires on the first failure regardless, so the first cycle is
still visible — only the escalation to critical waits for a second cycle to
confirm it.

Calibration against the current state: the four stale schedules sit at 46.8 to
48.5 hours since their last success, so the new threshold leaves roughly twelve
hours — exactly until today's runs. If those fail too, the alert fires, which
is the intended behaviour rather than a gap.

Verified: the rule passes a server-side dry run, the expression returns nothing
at 60h, and the same query at a lower bound returns the four affected schedules
with their ages — so the selector is known to match rather than merely silent.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 09:35:09 +02:00
k.renner 7b0b664a46 Merge pull request 'chore(talos): move to v1.13.9' (#656) from talos-1-13-9 into master
ci/woodpecker/cron/alert-monitor Pipeline was successful
Reviewed-on: k.renner/homelab#656
2026-08-27 06:57:58 +00:00
claude-botandClaude Opus 5 3abdeb2203 chore(talos): move to v1.13.9
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci-scripts-test Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci-manifests-test Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/pr-review Pipeline was successful
Nodes run v1.12.11, which is the last 1.12 patch — v1.12.12 does not exist.
v1.13.9 is current.

The upgrade path is the documented one rather than a shortcut. Migration is
only tested between adjacent minor releases, and the recommendation is to go
to the latest patch of each intermediate minor. 1.12.11 -> 1.13.9 satisfies
both: one minor step, taken from the last patch of the version being left. No
intermediate hop is needed.

Kubernetes is not forced along. Talos 1.13's support matrix lists 1.36, 1.35,
1.34, 1.33, 1.32 and 1.31, and the cluster runs 1.35.2 — so it stays there
until `talosctl upgrade-k8s` moves it as a separate decision. This was the one
open question before the jump and it is answered from the matrix rather than
assumed.

Deprecations in 1.13 were checked against this cluster, not just read:

  .machine.env -> EnvironmentConfig          not used
  .machine.network.kubespan -> KubeSpanConfig not used
  EtcdConfigs/KubeletConfigs protobuf change  no consumer in this repo
  legacy upgrade API -> LifecycleService      still functional; `talosctl
                                              upgrade` keeps working, this
                                              only matters once it is removed

Both the five machine-config files here and the live config on k8s-1 were
checked for the first two, because the running config is generated from a base
this repo only patches and could carry fields the patches never mention.
Neither appears in either.

The removed interactive installer and the dropped `talosctl install` do not
apply — installation here is `talosctl upgrade --image` and Image Factory
media.

Schematic is unchanged; the factory image was verified to exist for the new
tag before committing. The cold-rebuild ISO URL moves with it.

Not applied to any node. Rolling it out is drain -> upgrade -> wait for Ceph
to return to 217 PGs active+clean, one node at a time, as in the 1.12.11 run.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 08:56:20 +02:00
k.renner cdebaba2d3 Merge pull request 'chore(rook-ceph): return mon_data_avail_warn to the Ceph default' (#655) from ceph-mon-disk-warn-default into master
ci/woodpecker/cron/issue-fix Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/cron/alert-monitor Pipeline was successful
Reviewed-on: k.renner/homelab#655
2026-08-27 06:40:38 +00:00
4 changed files with 51 additions and 14 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ all three nodes identically from there, since `apply-config --insecure` does
not care whether the target is a VM or bare metal.
```
https://factory.talos.dev/image/0f6fb8bd8bb53013e9743b7c7b099d96fb9c32fd2464ced32693c2dc0ea5feb9/v1.12.11/metal-amd64.iso
https://factory.talos.dev/image/0f6fb8bd8bb53013e9743b7c7b099d96fb9c32fd2464ced32693c2dc0ea5feb9/v1.13.9/metal-amd64.iso
```
That schematic is deliberately not the one `.woodpecker/deploy-infrastructure.yml`
@@ -40,17 +40,31 @@ spec:
description: "A Velero backup run for {{ $labels.schedule }} completed with Failed or PartiallyFailed status in the last hour. Inspect with `kubectl -n velero get backup.velero.io -l velero.io/schedule-name={{ $labels.schedule }}` and the velero pod logs."
- alert: VeleroBackupStale
# Daily schedule with no successful backup in over 30h: covers
# the case where multiple consecutive runs failed (Garage flapping
# over the backup window) without the per-event alerts being
# acted on.
# Daily schedule with no successful backup in over 60h: covers the
# case where consecutive runs failed without the per-event alerts
# being acted on.
#
# 60h, not 30h. At 30h a single missed cycle pages, and a single
# missed cycle is the normal cost of touching the nodes: Velero moves
# data through pods, so draining a node kills whatever upload is in
# flight and the schedule is simply lost for that day — it is not
# retried. Rolling node work between 03:15 and 08:45 UTC therefore
# produced a guaranteed critical alert for every schedule it
# overlapped, which is noise about planned work rather than a signal
# about backups.
#
# 60h still catches what this is for. Two consecutive failures is no
# longer explicable by one maintenance window, and the per-event
# VeleroBackupFailed alert fires on the first failure regardless — so
# nothing is hidden, only the escalation to critical is deferred
# until a second cycle confirms it.
expr: |
time() - velero_backup_last_successful_timestamp{schedule!=""} > 30 * 3600
time() - velero_backup_last_successful_timestamp{schedule!=""} > 60 * 3600
and
velero_backup_last_successful_timestamp{schedule!=""} > 0
for: 10m
labels:
severity: critical
annotations:
summary: "Velero {{ $labels.schedule }} has no successful backup in 30h+"
description: "Last successful backup for {{ $labels.schedule }} was over 30 hours ago. With a daily schedule that means at least one full cycle missed. RPO is degrading."
summary: "Velero {{ $labels.schedule }} has no successful backup in 60h+"
description: "Last successful backup for {{ $labels.schedule }} was over 60 hours ago. With a daily schedule that is at least two consecutive cycles missed, which one maintenance window does not explain. RPO is degrading."
@@ -203,16 +203,16 @@ metadata:
labels:
app.kubernetes.io/part-of: homelab-backup
spec:
# Daily at 06:45 local (next free stagger slot). All nine PVCs live
# in the home-assistant namespace regardless of which app/ dir owns
# Daily at 06:45 local (next free stagger slot). The app PVCs live in
# the home-assistant namespace regardless of which app/ dir owns
# their manifest (matter-server, otbr, whisper, speech-to-phrase,
# zone-configurator all set `namespace: home-assistant` via their
# Kustomization, not per-resource): home-assistant-config (.storage
# entity registry, recorder DB, secrets.yaml), esphome-data,
# shelly-manager-data, matter-server-data, otbr-data, whisper-data,
# speech-to-phrase-models, speech-to-phrase-train,
# zone-configurator-config. No CNPG cluster in this namespace, so no
# label exclusion is needed. On restore, home-assistant-config has its
# speech-to-phrase-models, speech-to-phrase-train, zigbee2mqtt-data,
# zwavejs-store, zone-configurator-config. On restore,
# home-assistant-config has its
# own path (the HA pod's `seed` initContainer pulling the native HAOS
# backup from Garage, see the home-assistant Kustomization comment in
# kubernetes/clusters/homelab/home-assistant.yaml); layering a Velero
@@ -229,6 +229,20 @@ spec:
storageLocation: default
ttl: 720h0m0s
snapshotMoveData: true
# The ha-pg CNPG cluster now runs in this namespace (it did not when
# this schedule was written — the old comment here still claimed
# "no CNPG cluster in this namespace"). Its PVC ha-pg-1 carries the
# cnpg.io/cluster label and was being swept in: a crash-consistent
# snapshot of a running Postgres data directory is not a restorable
# backup, the same trap the wordpress-daily comment below describes.
# ha-pg is covered by Barman — daily base backup at 02:50 UTC
# (kubernetes/apps/home-assistant/ha-pg-scheduled-backup.yaml) plus
# continuous WAL archiving — so this exclusion removes a redundant
# 20 GiB upload, matching paperless/authentik/immich/trmnl above.
labelSelector:
matchExpressions:
- key: cnpg.io/cluster
operator: DoesNotExist
---
apiVersion: velero.io/v1
kind: Schedule
+10 -1
View File
@@ -42,8 +42,17 @@ machine:
# Only read at install and upgrade time. Changing it here does nothing to a
# running node until that node is upgraded. Bump the tag with the Talos
# version — it must match the running version, or the upgrade is a downgrade.
#
# Upgrades follow the documented path: migration is only tested between
# adjacent minor releases, so go to the latest patch of each intermediate
# minor rather than skipping. 1.12.11 -> 1.13.9 satisfies that — one minor
# step from the last 1.12 patch, no intermediate needed.
#
# Kubernetes is a separate decision and is not forced by this. Talos 1.13
# supports Kubernetes 1.36, 1.35, 1.34, 1.33, 1.32 and 1.31, so the cluster
# stays on 1.35.2 until `talosctl upgrade-k8s` moves it deliberately.
install:
image: factory.talos.dev/metal-installer/0f6fb8bd8bb53013e9743b7c7b099d96fb9c32fd2464ced32693c2dc0ea5feb9:v1.12.11
image: factory.talos.dev/metal-installer/0f6fb8bd8bb53013e9743b7c7b099d96fb9c32fd2464ced32693c2dc0ea5feb9:v1.13.9
features:
rbac: true
stableHostname: true