Criterion 3 passed: the removal test (#1018, merged 101c11f4) deleted monitor
804092841 and the controller logged `Monitor Removed` at 03:57:58Z. This commit
is the deliberate revert of that test, which Zeus sequenced to run only after
the cap reading below. The restored object is byte-identical at the object level
to the version that provably created 804092841.
It also corrects a wrong claim this file asserted. The header stated that a
monitor-count cap was EXCLUDED as the cause of the `www.renner.uno` 403, on the
reasoning that a cap would arrive as HTTP 200 + `stat: fail`. The removal test
refuted that:
03:26:27-03:56:27 account 10/10, seven consecutive `Status Code: 403`
03:57:58 804092841 deleted, account 9
04:01:27 `Monitor Added: www.renner.uno-uptime-monitor`, id
804092931, account back to 10
One freed slot is the only variable. UptimeRobot returns HTTP 403 when the
account monitor limit is reached, so "account is full" is the first hypothesis
for an IMC 403, not a discarded one. Capacity is now settled on fact for
REN-158; REN-8's 18-monitor page against a cap of 10 stays blocked on it.
Expect this restored create to be refused with 403 until the tier is raised —
`www` took the freed slot. Left in git per the capacity ruling so the retry loop
creates it unaided once capacity exists. `audiobooks.renner.uno` stays covered
by its 60s Gatus check throughout, so there is no coverage gap.
Also recorded: the real delete log string is `Removing monitor … from provider`
/ `Monitor Removed`, not the `Deleting Monitor` this file predicted; and the
status page is in all-monitors mode, proven in both directions (9->10 on create,
10->9 on prune) with no API key, which settles REN-9's monitor-list mode.
Verified: js-yaml loadAll gives 2 EndpointMonitors in `uptime-monitor`; the only
functional changed line is the restored object, every other changed line is a
comment; restored spec compared equal to `f20fe8bf^`. Not applied — Flux applies
from master and I cannot merge my own work.
Revert: revert this commit. Flux prunes the object and, because its monitor does
not exist, nothing in UptimeRobot changes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>