The check posted a completion under the descriptive model name and asserted a
reply came back. That proves nothing: a single-model llama-server ignores the
request's `model` field entirely. Confirmed against the live endpoint — it
answers to "voellig-erfundenes-modell-xyz" and reports "model":"chat" — so the
check passed whether or not the alias existed.
/v1/models is the only place the alias is observable, and it is what a client
reads to populate a picker, so both names are asserted there instead.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Every defect this stack shipped so far passed manifest validation and a 200
status code, and was only visible by using the endpoint. So the checks assert
behaviour, not liveness:
- the embedding model is absent from the chat endpoint, and /v1/embeddings is
not reachable through the ingress. It used to share the port, appeared in
the chat picker, and answered chat completions with fluent nonsense rather
than an error, because --embeddings does not refuse them.
- a completion returns non-empty content and finish_reason "stop". With
thinking on by default the model spent its whole budget on
reasoning_content and returned an empty answer inside a 200 response, which
a status-code assertion passes.
- the answer is coherent (knows Paris). llama-bench measures throughput and
would report excellent numbers for a backend emitting garbage.
- both the descriptive id and the `chat` handle route to the model.
- llama-embed serves a vector, reached from the monitoring namespace that
ai-ns.yaml admits, since that Service has no ingress by design.
- the Deployment still holds its gpu.intel.com/i915 allocation. Without it the
pod runs happily on CPU and only a throughput measurement would notice.
Lives in e2e-test.sh rather than scripts/ci/: these need a running model, and
the scripts/ci suites are contractually offline. It therefore runs on the daily
and weekly crons via e2e.yml and on the manual e2e-test target.
Two helpers added alongside the existing ones: llm_chat POSTs through the
ingress, helper_post POSTs from inside e2e-helper for Services with no ingress.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
`chat` as the sole alias hid which model was answering — in the picker, in
logs, and in any response body — and would have been ambiguous the moment a
second chat model existed.
--alias takes a comma-separated list, so both properties are available at once:
qwen3.6-35b-a3b is what callers see and says what is actually running, while
chat stays valid as a stable handle for Home Assistant, Paperless and CI, whose
config should not need an edit on the next model swap.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two problems found by exercising the live endpoint after #727.
The model id was the full --hf-repo string, so callers had to ask for
"ggml-org/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-GGUF:Q4_K_M". That name changes whenever the model
does, which would break every consumer's config on each swap. --alias chat
pins a stable name that survives model changes.
Qwen3.6 also enables thinking by default. A request with max_tokens 300 came
back with an empty `content` and finish_reason "length" — the entire budget had
gone into reasoning_content without ever reaching an answer. At ~11.6 tok/s that
is minutes of reasoning before a reply, which is wrong for voice and for short
answers generally. Verified against the live endpoint: the same prompt with
chat_template_kwargs {"enable_thinking": false} returns a correct two-sentence
German answer in 95 tokens at 12.0 tok/s.
Off by default; a client that wants reasoning can still ask for it per request.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two defects surfaced once the endpoint was live, and both trace back to
router mode.
The embedding model was selectable in the chat UI. Every model on the port
appears in the picker, and choosing the embedding one returns fluent nonsense
("capital capital capital ...") rather than an error, because --embeddings does
not actually refuse chat completions. llama.cpp offers no way to hide a model
from the list: --tags is informational, --ui-config only sets UI preferences.
So the embedding model moves to its own Deployment on a ClusterIP-only Service
with --no-webui, which is what keeps it out of the picker.
Readiness was also wrong. The router answers /health 200 as soon as it listens,
while models still download behind it, so the pod went Ready seconds after start
and traffic arrived at a server that could not answer — that is how the
embedding model got reached at all. A single-model server returns 503 until the
weights are resident, which is what the probes needed all along.
Splitting fixes both, at the cost of router mode's single endpoint. Consumers
now use llama-server for chat and llama-embed for embeddings; both share one
PVC as LLAMA_CACHE, so nothing is downloaded twice.
The chat model changes to a mixture-of-experts. Llama-3.1-8B was picked only
because it was the model benchmarked, which is continuity rather than a quality
argument, and it showed: fluent but wrong. Since decode is set by bytes read per
token, an MoE reading ~1.85 GB/token beats a dense model reading ~16.5 GB.
Measured on k8s-1 with this image:
tg128 11.59 tok/s (dense 8B: 10.78)
pp512 120.93 t/s
pp2048 126.47 t/s
pp8192 92.79 t/s
pp16384 69.84 t/s
Four times the model, slightly faster. The prefill falloff is sublinear, so the
Gated Delta Net collapse of llama.cpp#27638 does not occur here and long
documents stay viable; context therefore goes to 16k, which is cheap because
only 10 of 40 layers use full attention.
GLM-5.2/5.3 were evaluated and are impossible on this hardware at 754B
parameters (~400 GB), as is GLM-5.3-Flash at 321B with an architecture the
pinned build does not implement. Dense Qwen3.8-27B reads 16.5 GB/token and
manages 3.3 tok/s.
Memory goes to 24Gi/32Gi: Vulkan allocates the iGPU working set from system RAM
and it counts against the pod cgroup, measured at 7.54 GiB RSS for 5.2 GiB of
weights. --ubatch-size 1024 because 2048 and above fail with ErrorDeviceLost on
this Vulkan/Mesa stack.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The dump ran sqlite3's .backup with no busy handler. sqlite3 defaults its
busy timeout to 0 ms, so the online-backup API gave up the first time the
management container held the write lock instead of waiting for it, and
set -eu turned that into a failed job. Four nightly runs failed that way
before this, three attempts each, every one refused within seconds of the
ssh handshake.
NetBird sets no journal_mode on the store — its DSN carries only
_busy_timeout=30000 and cache=shared — so store.db uses the default
rollback journal, where a writer's lock blocks a reader outright. Under
WAL the reader would have gone through and this would never have come up.
.timeout arms the busy handler on the source connection, which is the
contended side. The shell's .backup never arms one on the destination and
does not need to: that file is created fresh in $tmp and nothing else
touches it.
VACUUM INTO replaces .backup because a busy timeout on its own only turns
an instant failure into a slow one. .backup copies 100 pages per
sqlite3_backup_step() and SQLite restarts the copy whenever the source is
written between steps, so against a steady writer it returns only once the
writes stop. Measured on a rollback-journal database of the same shape,
with a writer committing continuously for 20 s: .backup returned after
19 s, VACUUM INTO returned in under a second, and integrity_check on its
output passed. Both failed identically with no timeout at all, which is
what reproduced the production error. VACUUM INTO also compacts, so the
dump lands smaller than the live file.
30 s sits well inside the puller's 600 s activeDeadlineSeconds, and the
read transaction VACUUM INTO holds is covered by NetBird's own 30 s busy
timeout on the writing side.
The script lives on the VPS at /usr/local/bin/netbird-backup-dump and is
refreshed only when this role runs, so merging this to master is what
deploys it — deploy-netbird-server triggers on ansible/roles/netbird-server/**.
Closes#714. Refs #712.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The runbook said nothing requests /dev/dri and the extension was carried only
so hardware transcoding would later be a config change. Both halves are now
out of date: infrastructure/intel-gpu-plugin advertises gpu.intel.com/i915 from
it, and apps/llama-server requests that resource.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The initContainer's inline shell script named each model a second time, so the
model existed in two places: models.ini and the download script. Changing a
model in the ConfigMap alone left the pod fetching the old file and failing to
start, and the script itself was untested, unlinted YAML-embedded shell.
llama-server resolves Hugging Face repos natively, and `hf-repo` is honoured
inside a preset section: server-models.cpp calls unset_reserved_args(preset,
false) for model instances, so LLAMA_ARG_HF_REPO survives into the child; only
the router's own base preset has it stripped. Pointing LLAMA_CACHE at the models
PVC makes the download a one-time cost as before.
Verified against the pinned image rather than inferred: `-hf
Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B-GGUF:Q8_0` reaches "model loaded", and the rendered
models.ini yields "Loaded 2 custom model presets" with both `chat` and `embed`
registered and --hf-repo present in the spawned child's args.
models.ini is now the only place a model is named.
Also sets --cors-origins localhost. The server defaults to allowing every
origin and logs a warning about it at startup; without this, any page a LAN
browser visits could call this unauthenticated API from the user's machine.
Every consumer talks to it server-side, and the built-in WebUI is same-origin,
so nothing needs cross-origin access.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Bot <claude-bot@renner.uno>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds llama.cpp's server in router mode as the cluster's OpenAI-compatible
inference endpoint, in a new `ai` namespace, running entirely on the on-board
Iris Xe via the `gpu.intel.com/i915` resource.
One Deployment serves both a chat model and an embedding model: started with
--models-preset and no -m, llama-server supervises each INI section as its own
subprocess behind a single port, routed by the request body's "model" field.
That gives /v1/chat/completions, /v1/embeddings and /v1/rerank from one pod,
with a crash in one model not taking out the other.
Backend and build are chosen from measurement rather than documentation. On
this hardware (i9-12900H, Iris Xe 96 EU) Vulkan beats the SYCL/oneAPI build by
+50% prefill and +36% decode, so the Vulkan image is pinned to b10731 — the
exact build benchmarked. Full offload (-ngl 99) matches CPU throughput at
~10.8 tok/s decode and ~137 t/s prefill while leaving the node's 14 cores free
for the rest of the cluster; the iGPU is here for that isolation, not speed.
The weights are fetched by an initContainer on first start, so no manual
seeding step stands between a merge and a working endpoint. They land on a
prune-disabled CephFS RWX PVC and are skipped on later starts.
Exposed LAN-only at llm.renner.uno: the API is unauthenticated, so the
`dns.renner.uno/public` label is deliberately omitted and only the UDM
external-dns instance publishes the record.
The pod needs no hostPath and no privilege — the device plugin passes the
render node in through the device-plugin API — so `ai` takes the cluster's
default `baseline` enforcement with no pod-security labels.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds the Intel GPU device plugin as a DaemonSet in kube-system, making the
on-board Iris Xe of each MS-01 node schedulable as `gpu.intel.com/i915`.
Pods can then request the iGPU without a /dev/dri hostPath or privilege
escalation — the plugin passes the render node through the kubelet
device-plugin API. The resource covers QuickSync transcoding as well as GPU
compute.
Vendored from upstream v0.36.0 rather than installed from the
`intel-device-plugins-gpu` Helm chart: that chart renders a `GpuDevicePlugin`
custom resource requiring the Intel Device Plugin Operator, its CRDs and a
cert-manager webhook. One device type on three identical nodes gives the
operator nothing to manage that the DaemonSet does not.
Runs in kube-system because the plugin mounts hostPaths; the cluster enforces
PodSecurity `baseline`, which forbids those, and kube-system is the only
namespace in the API server's exemption list. NFD is not deployed, so
upstream's nfd_labeled_nodes overlay and its nodeSelector are omitted.
`-shared-dev-num=4` lets several containers share the single iGPU.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The formation wait failed with every node listed as unregistered, and the error
it now prints was the same one that broke the bootstrap call:
PermissionDenied: no request forwarding
`talosctl get members` went through the configured endpoint list rather than to a
specific machine, and apid will not forward it. It happened to work on some runs
and not others, depending on which endpoint was picked.
The second problem is worse and is not about VMs. Membership comes from the
discovery service, because the Kubernetes registry is disabled in the generated
config. So this step made a cold rebuild wait on discovery.talos.dev being
reachable, before the cluster being rebuilt exists — an internet dependency in
the middle of the disaster path, gating the bootstrap.
Neither is needed. What has to be true before etcd is bootstrapped is local: the
config took, the machine rebooted into it, and it is the machine we think it is.
The wait now asks each address directly for its hostname and expects the name its
own patch assigns — which also catches a patch landing on the wrong machine,
something the member list never checked.
The failure names the address, what it expected, and what it last answered.
Four nodes Ready says nothing about whether Ceph could use them. The CephCluster
picks OSD nodes by a label out of the machine config and their device by the
partition label RawVolumeConfig creates, so the phase now asserts both on every
worker: the r-ceph-osd partition exists, and the Kubernetes node carries
storage.renner.uno/ceph-osd.
Checking this by hand afterwards does not work — the run's EXIT trap destroys the
VMs as soon as it finishes, and that race was lost on the last attempt, leaving
the partition confirmed on exactly one worker from an earlier failed run.
Also drops the second statement of how many VMs there are. The node patch lists
are the count now, rather than the flags and the progress line each carrying
their own copy, and the addresses follow from the list instead of being spelled
out. That list had already gone stale once when the topology moved from three
control planes to one plus three workers.
The four-VM run reported:
error executing bootstrap: rpc error: code = PermissionDenied
desc = no request forwarding
and the cluster then sat idle. Nothing downstream noticed: `talosctl kubeconfig`
still succeeded, because Talos issues credentials as soon as it can rather than
when kube-apiserver serves, so the run carried on to the API wait as if it had
bootstrapped.
etcd bootstrap is the one call apid will not forward — reached through any node
other than the target it fails outright. `talosctl bootstrap` with neither -n nor
-e picks an endpoint from the configured list, and that list holds every control
plane, plus the workers in the vmtest phase. Whether it landed on the right node
was chance, in a real rebuild as much as on VMs.
Only visible because the previous commit stopped discarding this error.
The four-VM run died on "Talos cluster didn't form" after 150s. The message was
wrong twice over: the wait was too short, and it could not have told the
difference between an incomplete member list and no node answering at all,
because talosctl's error went to /dev/null.
Membership here comes only from the discovery service — the Kubernetes registry
is disabled — so a node registers after it has installed to disk and rebooted.
Four machines do not finish that in 150s. The timeout is now 10 minutes, and the
failure names the nodes that never registered, the last talosctl error, and the
member list it actually saw.
Three more of the same shape in this phase:
`talosctl bootstrap` discarded every error. The `|| true` exists because
re-running against an already-bootstrapped cluster is fine, but it hid genuine
failures too, and the run then continued to break somewhere further on with
nothing pointing back here. Anything that is not "already exists" is now
reported.
`talosctl kubeconfig` held its error while retrying and then failed with
"Couldn't get kubeconfig" and no reason. The reason is now printed when the
retries run out.
The node-ready wait counted with `grep -c "Ready"`, which also matches NotReady —
the substring is in it. So it waited for nodes to register, not to become ready,
and would report success with every node still NotReady. It now matches the
STATUS column whole. This is why the previous run's "3 nodes Ready" claim was
not evidence of readiness; whether those nodes were in fact ready is unknown.
The CephCluster named three hostnames and three drive serials. That tied the
storage layer to these three boxes as firmly as the Talos config used to be tied
to them, and for the same reason: it said in a Kubernetes manifest something only
the machine knows.
Now the machine says it, twice:
nodeLabels storage.renner.uno/ceph-osd which machines carry storage.
placement.osd.nodeAffinity reads it,
so useAllNodes can be true without
putting OSDs everywhere — that
nodeAffinity is the only thing
keeping them off diskless nodes.
RawVolumeConfig ceph-osd which disk, chosen by a CEL
expression per machine. The
partition surfaces at
/dev/disk/by-partlabel/r-ceph-osd
and that is what Rook consumes.
devicePathFilter carries both that partlabel and the OSD model for now. The
three production drives hold bluestore written straight onto the raw disk, with
no partition table and so no partition label to match; they are migrated
separately, one node at a time, and the by-id half goes when they are. Matching
the remaining half by model rather than by three individual serials already means
a drive swap is not a repo edit.
Resource requests now follow what the daemons use, measured on the running
cluster: mon ~420Mi against a 2Gi request, mgr ~650Mi against 4Gi, OSDs ~2.2Gi
against 4Gi — roughly 17GiB reserved cluster-wide and never touched. Limits stay
where they were, so burst headroom is unchanged; only the reservation moves.
Guaranteed QoS is given up deliberately, and priorityClassNames already pins
these to system-node-critical, which is what actually orders eviction. The OSD
request is set above measured use on purpose: an OSD grows into Ceph's
osd_memory_target, so 2.2Gi is a floor rather than a ceiling.
The vmtest phase becomes one control plane and three workers. Workers because
the QEMU provisioner gives the second disk only to worker machines and an OSD
needs one; three because the mons run with allowMultiplePerNode false and the
pools are replica 3 over failureDomain host. The apply loop now walks ALL_NODES
once instead of once per role, so NODE_ADDRS stays a single ordered list.
Not yet verified: whether Ceph actually reaches Ready on the VMs. That is the
point of the run this enables, and the memory budget is tight enough that it may
not — 2.5GiB plus three times 4GiB against 15.4GiB available.
Both bootstrap calls hardcoded --branch=master, which is why the flux phase could
never be tried before it was needed: `flux bootstrap` commits its own sync
manifests into the branch it reconciles, so running it wrote to the source a
rebuild depends on.
FLUX_BRANCH defaults to master and can be pointed at a throwaway branch. That
branch has to exist first — `flux bootstrap` clones it and fails with
`couldn't find remote ref` rather than creating it, which is not obvious and is
why the comment spells the two commands out.
Rehearsed against a scratch cluster to establish that: `flux bootstrap` clones
the named branch, commits its manifests there, and installs the controllers. The
waits after it need real disks and were not exercised.
Nothing else about the phase changes, which is the point — a rehearsal that takes
a different code path proves less than one that takes the same one.
bootstrap.sh generated a config and then edited it with awk before applying it,
cutting out the HostnameConfig document `talosctl gen config` emits. That was
added in April when Talos 1.12 started emitting it, and it has been load-bearing
since: without it apid rejects apply-config outright with
static hostname is already set in v1alpha1 config
The document was never the problem. Naming the host in two schemas at once is:
machine.network.hostname and machine.features.stableHostname are the v1alpha1
spellings of what the generated document already says. Setting the name in the
document instead — with `auto: off`, which is otherwise mutually exclusive with
a static name — removes the conflict, and with it the awk.
That matters beyond tidiness. Post-processing the generator's output meant the
config could only be produced by this one script: anything else that ran
`talosctl gen config` against these patches, including `talosctl cluster create`,
got a config the nodes refuse. Which is why none of this had ever been tried
outside a real rebuild.
Two more values moved out of cluster.yaml for the same reason — they described
this network rather than this cluster, so a config generated for anywhere else
was wrong before it was applied:
kubelet.nodeIP.validSubnets now talos/patches/site-homelab.yaml, a third
layer between the cluster and the machine. It
pinned every node to 10.2.40.0/24 whether or not
it has an interface there.
cluster.controlPlane.endpoint removed outright. `gen config` takes the
endpoint as its second argument and bootstrap.sh
already passes it; restating it here overrode
whatever a caller had generated for.
With that, `./bootstrap.sh vmtest` provisions three throwaway QEMU VMs and runs
the talos phase against them unchanged. It is deliberately not a copy of that
phase: it sets NODES, NODE_ADDRS, SITE and K8S_API_HOST and falls through, so a
passing test says something about a rebuild rather than about itself. Talos
version and Image Factory schematic are read out of install.image in
cluster.yaml rather than named again.
It found two real defects on its first run, both fixed here:
The phase used the kubeconfig the moment `talosctl kubeconfig` returned, which is
when Talos can issue credentials — not when kube-apiserver is serving on the
endpoint the file points at. Helm hit `EOF` against a port nothing was listening
on. It now waits for `kubectl get --raw /version`, which needs the server;
`kubectl version` would have answered from the client and passed against nothing.
`echo` without -e printed raw escape codes instead of colouring the per-node
result.
TALOSCONFIG/KUBECONFIG are honoured for the access files instead of hardcoded
$HOME paths, unset resolving to the same two paths as before. That is what keeps
a test run from replacing the operator's production access with a VM's; access-
staging is skipped under vmtest for the same reason.
Verified: three VMs Ready on Cilium 1.20.1 from the HelmRelease, and all four
node patches generate and validate with no post-processing at all.
Not covered, and still only provable on hardware: Ceph (the provisioner gives
extra disks to workers only), the mgmt and v30iot VLANs, the Layer2 VIP, Flux,
and applying the three changed production patches to the real nodes.
The name says the bootstrap depends on a registry mirror. Reading the patch list
in the runbook, that is the obvious conclusion — and it would be a serious
problem, because a cold rebuild has no mirror: an in-cluster one cannot exist
before the cluster does.
The file configures no mirror. It writes one containerd setting,
discard_unpacked_layers = false, so that pulled layers stay in the content store
and Spegel can advertise them to peers later. Spegel writes the per-registry
hosts.toml itself at runtime; the file's own comment says a
machine.registries.mirrors block is not needed, and there is none anywhere in
talos/patches. Image pulls at bootstrap go straight to the real registries.
So the alarm the name raises is false, but it is the name doing it, and the cost
of that is someone deciding a rebuild is blocked when it is not.
containerd-layer-retention.yaml describes the single thing inside.
Renamed with git mv and the three references updated. Verified `talosctl gen
config` still produces a config with the renamed patch in the list.
The Cilium install had become a block of shell in a runbook for a human to
paste. That is the same rot as a pinned version — nobody runs it between
rebuilds, so nothing tells you when it stopped working. It belongs in the script
that already drives the rest of the bootstrap.
The talos phase was unusable since #581: it passed cilium-cni.yaml whole, and
that file's `$patch: delete` document fails against a config with no
inlineManifests. The file is gone, so the failure is gone with it — reviving the
phase was mostly deleting two lines that referenced it.
It now installs Cilium between `talosctl bootstrap` and the node-Ready wait,
which is the only place it can go: with `cni: none` the kubelet stays NotReady
until a CNI exists, so the wait below would otherwise time out against a cluster
that was never going to converge.
Chart repo, version constraint and values are read out of helmrelease.yaml at
run time, so the script cannot install something different from what Flux
reconciles minutes later. helm takes the semver range verbatim. There is a guard
on the extracted values — the HelmRelease is a two-document file and selecting
the wrong one yields an empty values set that helm silently renders as chart
defaults, which is a failure mode worth catching loudly rather than discovering
in a datapath.
`--wait` because the next step needs a working network, and `upgrade --install`
so a re-run after a partial bootstrap converges instead of erroring.
Verified as far as it can be without wiping a cluster: `talosctl gen config`
with exactly the patch list the script now passes produces a config carrying
cni: none and proxy: disabled, no Cilium manifests, and it validates for metal
mode. The apply-and-bootstrap half is untested since the rewrite, and the
runbook says so — it keeps the manual procedure as the thing to read first and
to fall back on.
The install command in Step 2b hardcoded --version 1.20.1 and the chart repo
URL. That is a copy of the HelmRelease in a text file nobody runs between
rebuilds, so it would have gone stale unnoticed and the next rebuild would have
installed something Flux immediately fought — the same failure the deleted
bootstrap seed produced, in a new place.
Everything now comes out of helmrelease.yaml at the moment the command runs:
the repo URL from the HelmRepository, the values from .spec.values, and
--version from .spec.chart.spec.version verbatim. Helm accepts the semver range
and resolves it exactly as Flux does, so the two cannot pick different releases.
Verified by running the block as written:
--version ">=1.20.0 <1.21.0" -> cilium:v1.20.1, operator-generic:v1.20.1
enable-bgp-control-plane: "true" bpf-lb-sock: "true"
bpf-policy-map-max: "65536" ipv4-native-routing-cidr: 10.0.0.0/8
ServiceMonitor objects: 0
which is the config the cluster is running.
The only literal left is --set prometheus.serviceMonitor.enabled=false, and it
is a bootstrap constraint rather than a value: the CRD arrives with the
monitoring stack long afterwards. Because nothing else is overridden,
helm-controller adopts this release instead of replacing it.
This does not make the step unnecessary. Flux's controllers are pods and cannot
reconcile a CNI they need in order to run; something has to seed it. What it
does mean is that the step has nothing left in it to maintain.
Both blocking findings from the review on #709, and both were real.
The deleted cilium-cni.yaml was the only place in the repo that set
cluster.network.cni.name: none and cluster.proxy.disabled: true. They sat in its
second document next to the inline manifest, so removing the file removed them
too — a fresh `talosctl gen config` from this repo's patches would have produced
a config with Talos's default CNI and kube-proxy running, against a Cilium
release configured with kubeProxyReplacement: true. Two runbooks meanwhile
asserted that cluster.yaml supplied both, which it did not.
RUNBOOK-baremetal-conversion.md also still passed `@<cilium additive half>` in
its gen-config example, three lines above prose saying there is no CNI patch any
more. The equivalent block in the cold-rebuild runbook had been fixed; this one
was missed.
Verified the way it should have been in the first place — by running the
runbook's own command rather than inspecting the live cluster:
talosctl gen config homelab https://k8s.renner.uno:6443 \
--output-types controlplane \
--config-patch @talos/patches/cluster.yaml \
--config-patch @talos/patches/registry-mirror.yaml \
--config-patch @talos/patches/k8s-1.yaml
-> cni=none proxy.disabled=true
-> 0 cilium manifests
The live cluster could never have caught this. It has carried both settings
since it was built, and the node configs were patched by hand rather than
regenerated, so nothing in the verification touched the path a rebuild actually
uses.
Final step of PROPOSAL-cilium-single-owner.md. Talos no longer carries Cilium in
any form, and the HelmRelease is the only place it is configured.
The cluster side is already done and verified:
- the cilium inline manifest is gone from all three machine configs, applied
node by node with no reboot and no effect on the running CNI
- Kubernetes went 1.35.2 -> 1.36.3 in the same operation, with
--manifests-no-prune so the 22 objects Talos claimed were not deleted
- Talos's bootstrap-manifest inventory went from 41 entries to 13, and the 28
cilium/hubble entries are gone. A prune-enabled `upgrade-k8s --dry-run`
reported 28 deletions before and reports 0 now
That last number is the point of the whole exercise. A bare `upgrade-k8s` used
to destroy the CNI and now does nothing to it.
The inventory entries had to be removed by hand. --manifests-no-prune skips the
prune AND the inventory rewrite, so the run that saved the objects also left
Talos still claiming them — the mine was deferred, not cleared. Talos offers no
way to drop a stale claim without the prune that deletes, so the ConfigMap was
edited directly. It is derived bookkeeping, not configuration, and the result is
verifiable in both directions, which is why this was acceptable where hand-
editing configuration would not be.
Repo side, this commit:
- deletes talos/patches/cilium-cni.yaml and talos/cilium.yaml
- adds Step 2b to RUNBOOK-cold-rebuild.md: install Cilium from the HelmRelease
values with helm, after bootstrap and before Flux. The nodes stay NotReady
until then, which the runbook now says out loud rather than leaving someone
to wonder
- drops the "keep in lockstep" and "THREE COPIES" comments, which described a
duplication that no longer exists, and replaces them with one note saying
where Cilium is configured
- corrects RUNBOOK-baremetal-conversion.md, which told the reader to extract
half of a file that is gone
bootstrap.sh is left alone. Its talos phase was already dead and is now dead for
a second reason; the runbook says so.
The cost, stated plainly: the cluster no longer forms itself from the machine
config. A cold rebuild needs one documented helm install that it did not need
before. That is the price of Cilium existing in exactly one place.
Step 1 of the ownership transition in PROPOSAL-cilium-single-owner.md. Nothing
about ownership changes yet — this only moves three live settings out of nowhere
and into git.
enable-bgp-control-plane and both native-routing CIDRs existed in no file at
all. They were applied by hand and are held by the `kubectl-patch` field manager
on cilium-config; server-side apply left them alone, so nothing broke and
nothing reported them. The peering itself was always in git as CRDs in
post-crds/cilium-bgp.yaml, which is what made the gap invisible: BGP looked
configured because its policy was version-controlled, while the switch that
starts the control plane was not. A cold rebuild installs only what git
describes, so it would have come up with two established-looking peers
configured and no BGP at all.
The CIDRs go with it because they are the same decision. They are a masquerading
exception, not a routing statement: pod traffic to 10.0.0.0/8 and fd00::/8
leaves unmasqueraded so LAN services see real pod IPs, and that only works
because BGP advertises the pod CIDRs and gives the UDM a route back. Tracking
one without the other would leave a half-decision in git.
This is not purely a change of ownership, which is why it is its own step and
not folded into a later one. Enabling bgpControlPlane through the chart emits
five companion keys the hand-patch never set, so Cilium has been running on its
own internal defaults for router-id allocation among others. They should agree
with the chart's; if they do not, the sessions re-establish. Verify the peers
after Flux reconciles before moving to step 2.
The proposal called the tunnel redundant because the underlay already has
routes to the pod CIDRs. That reads the two as alternatives, and they are not:
VXLAN carries pod-to-pod directly between nodes, while the BGP-advertised pod
CIDRs exist so traffic from the LAN can reach pods at all, which necessarily
goes through the UDM.
Removing the encapsulation would therefore not remove a layer. It would move
inter-node pod traffic off a direct node-to-node path and onto the underlay,
through the router.
The observation worth keeping is narrower: routingMode is set nowhere, so the
current behaviour is an unexamined chart default rather than a recorded
decision. It happens to be the right default.
Cilium is currently owned twice. The 22 objects that make up the whole
installation — both DaemonSets, the operator, both ConfigMaps, the RBAC, the
cilium-secrets namespace — are listed in Talos's bootstrap-manifest inventory
and simultaneously carry Helm's release annotations. cilium-config has three
field managers.
That is not a tidiness problem. It produced a bootstrap seed twelve days behind
the chart, where a Kubernetes upgrade would have downgraded the CNI and switched
off socket load balancing, and it left the BGP control-plane switch and both
native-routing CIDRs existing in no file at all, so a cold rebuild would have
come up without BGP while the peering CRDs in git said otherwise.
This records the decision — Flux owns Cilium, Talos provides only cni: none and
proxy: disabled — and the ordered transition, including why the order matters:
Talos prunes what its inventory used to list and no longer does, so removing the
manifest naively deletes the CNI.
Two claims in it are verified rather than assumed. An OS upgrade does not
reconcile bootstrap manifests: Talos went to 1.13.9 four days ago and Cilium
stayed at 1.20.1 despite the seed saying 1.19.2. And the prune can be tested
before it is run, because NoPrune is honoured by the dry run as well as the
apply.
No code changes here. PR #706 stays WIP until this is agreed.
The agent was the last workload in this repo running a real service with no
probe of any kind. WOODPECKER_HEALTHCHECK defaults to true and already serves
:3000, so nothing had to be enabled — the port was simply never declared and
never probed. Confirmed against the running pod: /healthz answers 200, / and
/metrics do not.
What it actually asserts is narrower than the name suggests, and narrower than
I assumed when proposing this. State.Healthy in agent/state.go returns false
only when a running workflow has passed its own timeout plus a one-hour buffer;
an agent with nothing to do always answers 200.
So this catches one specific failure — a wedged build holding a slot, which
today nobody would notice — and explicitly does not catch an agent that has
lost its connection to the server. That agent reports healthy while quietly
taking no work, which was the failure I originally wanted to cover. The comment
says so, because a green probe here is easy to misread as "CI is fine".
Liveness only. The agent fronts no Service, so a readiness probe would gate
nothing. Thresholds are short because the upstream condition already carries an
hour of debounce.
Everything else still unprobed is either operator- or chart-owned (Rook, the
authentik outposts, the kube-prometheus-stack sidecars, Multus, cert-manager,
mariadb-operator, velero node-agent) or a sidecar loop with no listening socket
where an exec probe would assert little beyond what container exit already
does.
Continues the paperless change. Under the split where gatus watches from
outside and Kubernetes watches the pods, a container with no probe at all is
the hole: it stays Ready while dead, and nothing downstream can tell.
Not every one of them got a probe, and the ones that did not are the more
interesting half.
Added:
whisper, openwakeword tcpSocket on the wyoming port. These speak a raw
speech-to-phrase TCP protocol with no HTTP surface and no health
verb, so accepting a connection is all that can
be asserted from outside the process. Weak, but
the previous state was nothing at all, and a dead
server kept being routed speech.
speech-to-phrase gets a startupProbe rather than
a long liveness delay: it runs --retrain-on-start
and retraining takes as long as it takes. The
gate allows 10 minutes and only then hands over,
so a slow retrain is not mistaken for a hang
while a real hang is still caught in a minute.
ftp-scanner tcpSocket on the FTP control port. This is the
failure that hides best: if vsftpd dies, the
scanner cannot deposit anything and paperless
just sees an empty consume directory, which looks
exactly like nobody having scanned.
code-server httpGet /healthz. Answers 200 whenever the server
is up; its body reports session heartbeat, which
is not health — an idle editor reports "expired"
and is fine.
external-secrets livenessProbe/readinessProbe enabled through the
chart's own values, which is also what starts its
health server: without them the controller
exposes nothing but a metrics port. A wedged
reconciler stayed Ready while every ExternalSecret
silently stopped refreshing.
Deliberately left alone:
protonmail-bridge Already carries a rationale: the bridge can be
offline while the user re-authenticates, and
paperless retries mail fetches itself. A liveness
probe would restart it mid-re-auth. That is a
considered decision, not an omission.
bridge-tls-proxy socat binds 127.0.0.1:11143. Probes are dialled
by the kubelet against the pod IP, so there is
nothing for it to reach.
mariadb-operator Its chart exposes no probe values and no health
bind address. Forcing them through a postRenderer
would break on the next chart bump, so it stays
unprobed and this records why.
ak-outpost-* (11) Pod specs are owned by the goauthentik.io
operator; nothing here can add to them.
Validated with Flux's field manager against the live cluster.
Under the split where gatus watches from outside and Kubernetes watches the
pods, paperless was the weakest link on the Kubernetes side: both probes were
tcpSocket, which only proves gunicorn accepted a connection. A worker deadlock
or a broken Django config would keep the pod Ready.
The existing comment explained why: HTTP probes against /api/ flood
`paperless.auth`, because ENABLE_HTTP_REMOTE_USER makes the remote-user
middleware log every unauthenticated API request. That was a real constraint
and the TCP fallback was a deliberate trade, not an oversight.
It is also narrower than the comment assumed. The middleware only covers the
API surface, and /accounts/login/ is a plain Django view. Measured against the
running pod:
4 requests to /accounts/login/ -> 0 new paperless.auth lines
4 requests to /api/ -> 4 new paperless.auth lines
So the noise is avoidable without giving up an HTTP probe. /accounts/login/
renders a template, which means URL routing, settings and the template engine
all have to be working. It does not prove Postgres is reachable — nothing cheap
on this surface does, and the comment now says so rather than implying more.
ALLOWED_HOSTS was the other way this could have failed: the kubelet sends the
pod IP as Host, and a restrictive value would answer 400 and crashloop the pod.
PAPERLESS_ALLOWED_HOSTS is "*", so it is safe today, and the comment records
what narrowing it would require.
Timings are unchanged — the 120s liveness delay is there for paperless's slow
start and nothing here makes it start faster.
Validated with Flux's own field manager. Applying as any other manager reports
the deployment invalid with two handler types, because tcpSocket stays owned by
kustomize-controller and is not cleared by a foreign apply; that is an artifact
of the check, not of the manifest.
Three services that nothing watched. Each needed a different answer, and the
difference is what the comments record.
ical-proxy serves an unauthenticated /health returning 200 with
{"status":"healthy"}. That is real app health, not reachability. Its root path
answers 404 by design — it only serves calendar paths — which is why a naive
probe of / would have looked broken and a naive fix would have been a module
that accepts 404.
Loki has no usable external vantage at all: every path through its ingress
answers 401, so an outside probe could only ever assert that the ingress is up.
In-cluster /ready answers 200 unauthenticated and lives in the monitoring
namespace, so it rides the same intra-namespace allowance the existing
Prometheus and Alertmanager health probes depend on. Verified through the
apiserver proxy before committing.
Paperless goes on the status page rather than into blackbox, and only at gate
level. Every path including /api/ answers 302 to unauthenticated callers, so
there is nothing to probe that proves the app instead of the Authentik outpost.
The entry says so. Closing that blind spot means probing the ClusterIP from
in-cluster, which crosses a namespace boundary and needs a CiliumNetworkPolicy
— the monitoring probes avoid one only because their targets share a namespace
with the prober. That is a separate change.
Paperless takes a new slot rather than the retired Web Service 7, which the
legend used to misattribute to it. Reusing a public label would silently
reassign what it means.
The upstream image is FROM scratch with no USER directive, so the pod ran as
root and tripped restricted on all four counts: allowPrivilegeEscalation,
capabilities, runAsNonRoot and seccompProfile.
fsGroup is what makes this survivable rather than a crash. The only write path
is the sqlite store on the RWO volume — storage.type sqlite, path
/data/gatus.db in the ConfigMap — and fsGroup both chowns the existing volume
on mount and leaves the directory group-writable, which sqlite needs to create
its -wal and -journal files beside the database.
The uid is numeric because a scratch image has no /etc/passwd for the kubelet
to resolve a name against.
readOnlyRootFilesystem is deliberately not set: restricted does not require it,
and on a scratch image there is nothing to gain that would justify the risk of
finding out at runtime that the binary wants a scratch path.
#696 deleted the Ingress and ExternalName Service for the NAS file UI because
they pointed at nas-1, which is off. It did not delete the gatus check for the
same hostname, so the public status page has been showing Web Service 7 as
failing ever since — verified against the live API, success: false.
That was my omission in #696: I removed the route and left the thing watching
it.
The label is retired rather than renumbered, matching Infrastructure 1 and 2.
The maintainer legend claimed Web Service 7 was Paperless. It never was — the
slot held the NAS file UI, and nothing in this config checks Paperless at all.
I added the missing Web Service 10 entry to this same map in #699 without
verifying the rest of it, which is how a wrong line survived a pass that was
supposed to be about exactly this map. Every remaining entry is now checked
against its URL.
Paperless is genuinely unmonitored here and is left that way deliberately:
adding coverage is a separate decision from correcting a map that lies.
This is also the ConfigMap change that exercises the Reloader annotation from
#700. That annotation landed after the ConfigMap it watches had already
changed, so no event ever fired and the pod kept serving the pre-#699 endpoint
list, still probing pbs2. This edit should reload it and clear both.
Dropping the PBS 2 check in the previous commit reconciled cleanly and changed
nothing. The ConfigMap in the cluster no longer lists it; the running instance
still reports Infrastructure 1, because Gatus reads its config once at startup
and the pod is 26 hours old.
Nothing about that state looks wrong from the outside. Flux reports the
Kustomization applied, the ConfigMap matches git, and no resource is failing —
the only symptom is that the endpoint list served by the app disagrees with the
one in the repo. Adding a check would have been just as invisible as removing
one.
Reloader has been installed cluster-wide for 40 days and eleven other workloads
already carry its annotation, across the apps, home-assistant, woodpecker,
wordpress and authentik namespaces. Gatus was simply never given one. The
annotation form for a ConfigMap is confirmed against upstream rather than
recalled: configmap.reloader.stakater.com/reload takes the ConfigMap name.
The pod restarts on reload and the deployment uses Recreate for its RWO volume,
so the status page has a short gap whenever the config changes. That is the
correct trade against serving checks that silently no longer match the repo.
Not addressed: the deployment trips PodSecurity restricted on four counts
(allowPrivilegeEscalation, capabilities, runAsNonRoot, seccompProfile). That
predates this and is its own change.
pbs2.renner.uno was probed every 60 seconds as "Infrastructure 1". Both of its
declared clients are gone: the PVE cluster, retired to bare-metal Talos, and
nas-1, powered off and removed from the repo. A liveness check on a backup
server that nothing backs up to reports on nothing — and hide-errors: true
meant its status carried no detail on the public page either.
The opaque label keeps its number and is marked retired, the way Infrastructure
2 already records the Proxmox VE slot. Those labels are public; renumbering
would silently reassign what every other number means.
Also fills a gap in the maintainer legend: Web Service 10 (TRMNL) was serving
but undocumented, so the map stopped matching the endpoint list at 9.
Checked: the embedded config still parses, 12 endpoints remain, and the only
surviving pbs2 mention is the removal note.
Nine of the thirteen blackbox-http targets were probed, graphed and completely
unalerted: gitea, immich, auth, home, prometheus, alerts and dash, plus the two
internal /-/healthy probes that exist specifically to catch a dead app behind a
live Authentik gate. That is the shape that let file.renner.uno serve 502 for
months.
BlackboxProbeFailing covers everything except the instances that already have a
dedicated rule. Measured against the running Prometheus before committing: the
selector returns exactly those nine and excludes the six with bespoke handling,
and the full expression as YAML delivers it evaluates to zero results today.
The exclusion list and the dedicated rules are one invariant, stated in the
file: an instance belongs in the list only while a rule elsewhere covers it,
and a new dedicated rule has to add its instance. Wrong in one direction the
alert fires twice, wrong in the other it never fires. Severity is warning
because a catch-all cannot know what any given target means — anything
deserving critical earns its own rule, which is also what puts it in the list.
That is what stops the list from being arbitrary.
BlackboxProbesAbsent is the check on the checks. Every endpoint alert reads
probe_success; if the job stops producing series none of them can fire, and
that silence is indistinguishable from health.
Also corrects the comment in prometheusrule-hetzner-backup.yaml claiming CNPG
pod metrics are not scraped and a granular archiving alert is a follow-up. Both
have existed for a while: cnpg-podmonitors.yaml scrapes the instances and
CNPGWalArchiveBacklog reads that collector.
Both were unmonitored. Neither is a leaf service: Woodpecker runs every cron
and deploy in this repo, and every ExternalSecret in the cluster resolves
through OpenBao.
OpenBao is probed at /v1/sys/health rather than at the root, because a sealed
instance still serves its UI. Root would answer 307 -> /ui/ -> 200 while every
secret lookup failed — the exact green-while-broken shape probes-blackbox.yaml
already warns about for the gated monitoring UIs.
standbyok=true is required, not cosmetic: the endpoint returns 200 only on the
active node and 429 on a standby, and the external route currently lands on a
standby. Measured — the bare path returns 429 right now, so an http_2xx probe
without the parameter would have been red from the first scrape. With it, 200
means initialized, unsealed and serving; 503 sealed and 501 uninitialized stay
red.
The alert matches OpenBao by instance prefix instead of the full target string,
because that target carries a query parameter and an exact match would fail
silently if the label ever encodes it differently.
Both alerts are new rules rather than additions to an existing file. Worth
noting while here: there is no generic blackbox-down rule. Only fsn1, netbird
and the two relays have alerts, so gitea, immich, auth, home, prometheus,
alerts and dash are probed and graphed but nothing fires if they go down. Not
addressed here — it needs a decision about whether to write one generic rule
and retire the per-instance ones.
The scan loop swallowed every Trivy failure with `|| true`, so a step that
scanned 21 of 22 images reported exactly the same as one that scanned all 22.
The gap was found by the fix agent noticing a missing file in its own input,
not by the pipeline.
The loop still continues past a bad image — one unpullable reference should not
cost the scan of everything after it — but now counts what failed, names it,
and exits non-zero:
--- scanned 21 of 22 images ---
NOT SCANNED: proxmox/proxmox-backup-client:latest
`failure: ignore` stays, which per Woodpecker's semantics reports the step as
failed while letting the workflow continue. That is deliberate: coverage is
reported, not enforced. The step goes red and the fix agent still runs on what
was scanned. Making the whole pipeline fail would mean one unscannable image
blocks all remediation.
The image that prompted this is gone with the nas-1 removal in the previous
commit, so the next run should report 20 of 20. The accounting is what matters
— the next dead reference will announce itself instead of being absorbed.
Refs #694
nas-1 has been off for months. Everything scoped to it went with it:
inventory/host_vars/nas-1.renner.uno/ vars and vault
[synology_nas] in pve_hosts.yml the group's only member
roles/pbs-client/ PBS backup client
plays/install-pbs-client.yml role-based, hosts: synology_nas
plays/install-pbs-client-synology.yml raw-module variant, same host
plays/install-garage-synology.yml Garage S3, replaced by Hetzner
.woodpecker/install-garage-synology.yml the pipeline that ran it
The two PBS plays were already inconsistent with each other before the host
went away: the role pulled aterfax/pbs-client, while the standalone play
pulled proxmox/proxmox-backup-client, which has never existed on Docker Hub
(404). Nothing referenced the standalone play at all. Both are moot now.
pve_hosts.yml keeps its "gone from this file, and why" list, so synology_nas is
recorded there alongside pve_cluster and the in-cluster migrations rather than
vanishing without trace.
Checked: `ansible-inventory --graph` resolves, and grep finds no remaining
reference to synology_nas, nas-1, pbs-client or the garage play outside that
one note. plays/archived/ is left alone — it is history, not live config.
file.renner.uno served HTTP 502. The Service is an ExternalName to
nas.renner.uno:7001, a CNAME to nas-1, and nas-1 has been off for months. The
Ingress and Service had been in the cluster for 110 days pointing at nothing.
Nothing caught it because file.renner.uno is not in the blackbox probe list, so
a publicly resolvable hostname returned 502 for months without a single alert.
The insecure-backend ServersTransport goes with it. It existed to let Traefik
re-encrypt to the NAS web UI's self-signed certificate and apps/file was its
only consumer, which its own header comment documents.
Rolls the security-scan pilot out to the other thirteen. Every workflow-root
gate of the form
- event: manual
evaluate: 'PIPELINE == "x"'
becomes
- event: deployment
evaluate: 'CI_PIPELINE_DEPLOY_TARGET == "x"'
The target rides in pipeline metadata rather than in the manual-run variable
map, so it reaches the workflow-root filter on Woodpecker 3.18 where PIPELINE
does not. Verified on the pilot: pipeline 7004 selected the security-scan
workflow and nothing else.
Two files also carry step-level manual gates, and those had to move with the
root or the pipelines would have converted into something that runs but cannot
do its job:
deploy-infrastructure the apply step gates on TOFU_APPLY. Left on
`event: manual` it would never fire again, so the
pipeline would plan and silently never apply.
TOFU_APPLY now arrives via `--param`, which lands in
the same non-plugin environment step-level `when`
evaluates against. No step here is a plugin — nothing
in .woodpecker uses `settings:` — so that path holds.
build-ci-images eight per-image steps gate on manual-or-push to decide
whether to rebuild. All eight follow the root.
Cron gates are untouched. They already matched by name everywhere except
security-scan, which the pilot fixed.
Also corrects the trigger documentation, including a claim in update-audit.yml
that the other pipelines gate on "an injected PIPELINE var set at cron-create
time in the UI". Crons cannot carry variables at all — `repo cron add` takes
name, branch, schedule and enabled. That sentence described a mechanism that
never existed and was the same misunderstanding that left the daily security
scan silently not running.
The `timeout: 30` lint warning on the four deploy-* files predates this and is
left alone.
Two separate bugs in one `when` block, only one of which is #582.
The cron gate has never matched. It asked for `PIPELINE == "security-scan"` on
`event: cron`, and crons cannot carry variables — `repo cron add` takes name,
branch, schedule and enabled, and nothing else. So the variable is undefined on
every cron run and the workflow is filtered out. The `daily-security-scan` cron
does fire, and pipeline 6877 shows what actually ran under it: the `e2e`
workflow alone, which opts into that cron by name. The Trivy scan and the
security-fix agent have not been running on schedule. This predates 3.18.0 and
would have survived any fix to it.
The manual gate is the #582 case. Woodpecker 3.18 stopped merging manual-run
variables into the environment the workflow-root filter evaluates against
(builder.go:102-111 builds it from metadata plus global envs; AdditionalEnvs is
passed to the compiler at line 223 but never into this map), so
`PIPELINE == "security-scan"` cannot be true there either.
Both now use selectors the root filter can actually see:
cron -> matched by the cron's NAME, the way alert-monitor and e2e
already do it. First-class filter, no variable involved.
deployment -> CI_PIPELINE_DEPLOY_TARGET, which comes from pipeline metadata
(metadata/environment.go:74) and therefore reaches the root
filter on 3.18.
Dispatch becomes `woodpecker-cli pipeline deploy k.renner/homelab <n>
security-scan` — a named deployment target rather than a magic variable that
exists only to pick which of fourteen files is allowed to run.
Pilot for the remaining thirteen. Nothing else is converted until this one is
confirmed working end to end.
The comment blamed #522 — Backup CRs deleted within a minute of completing, so
CNPG has no record to derive the metric from. That is not what is happening.
The CRs are retained: 31 completed backups for ak-pg, im-pg and pprl-pg, 19 for
tr-pg, 11 for wp-pg, 10 for ha-pg, the newest of each from this morning.
The metric still reads 0 everywhere. The actual cause is one level up: the
collector derives it from Cluster.status.lastSuccessfulBackup, and that field
is absent on every Cluster because they all back up with method: plugin and the
barman-cloud plugin path never writes it back. lastFailedBackup is populated on
three of them, which is what makes the absence look like "no backups" rather
than "no reporting".
The conclusion does not change — the alert still cannot be built on that metric
— but the stated blocker does, and #522 is not it. Whoever picks this up next
would have gone looking at CR retention and found nothing wrong.
Also drops the incident retellings and the dated "verified on" stamps from this
file's comments, which is the cleanup already applied elsewhere in the repo.
Chasing a stale comment turned up a live duplicate. Since serviceMonitorSelector
was loosened to {}, Prometheus discovers the goauthentik.io operator's own
ServiceMonitors — which is why it was loosened. The hand-written copies for ldap
and paperless-gate, added back when the strict selector was dropping the
operator's, now scrape the same endpoints a second time.
Measured, not assumed: 10.244.4.113:9300 and 10.244.4.76:9300 were each
producing 40 samples per 10 minutes against 20 for every other outpost, and
ldap picked up a third target because the hand-written selector matched the
plain Service as well as the -metrics one. No duplicate-timestamp errors,
because the two pools scrape at different offsets — the cost is doubled
ingestion and a target list that lies about how many outposts there are.
Radius stays, and the comment now says why it is not the same case: the
operator's ServiceMonitor for it selects on managed-by=goauthentik.io together
with service-type=metrics, and no Service carries both — the operator's has the
first, the one defined here has the second. It is the only thing scraping
radius, so deleting it would have been a silent loss.
Also corrects the comments that claimed the release label is required for
discovery. It is not, for ServiceMonitors and PodMonitors: those two selectors
are empty. It very much is for Probes, PrometheusRules and ScrapeConfigs, whose
selectors still match on it, so probes-blackbox.yaml now says so explicitly —
otherwise the corrected comments elsewhere read as license to drop the label
there too.
Live selector state, for the record:
serviceMonitorSelector {} podMonitorSelector {}
probeSelector / ruleSelector / scrapeConfigSelector release=kube-prometheus-stack
Deleting the wear warning outright went too far. Wear that is high AND still
climbing is exactly the thing worth knowing about; only the level on its own
is noise. This replaces the flat 80% threshold with the combination.
The rule now projects: at the write rate of the last seven days, when does the
drive reach 95%? Under six months, and above 80% already, it alerts. The
projection clears when writes slow, which the level never could.
The rate is self-calibrating. Each drive reports both lifetime bytes written
and its own wear percentage, so bytes-per-percent is derived from the drive
rather than from a rated-endurance table that would have to be kept in sync
with the hardware. That matters here because the fleet is three different
models with three different endurance ratings sharing one rule.
It also has to work that way. percentage_used is a whole-number percent and
advances roughly once every six weeks on these drives, so any rate taken from
it directly is either zero or a single step — far too coarse to project from,
and the reason a delta- or predict_linear-based rule would have been useless.
bytes_written moves on every scrape.
The >= 80 gate is numerical rather than editorial: bytes-per-percent divides
by an integer percentage, so on a lightly worn drive half a percent of
rounding swings the projection by tens of percent. Idle drives divide by a
zero rate, yield +Inf, and stay silent without needing a special case.
Measured against live Prometheus before committing: the expression returns
nothing today, and with the horizon widened it selects exactly the three
Crucial drives at 81/83/87%, projecting 7822, 6513 and 3544 days to 95%. High,
flat, and roughly a decade of headroom — which is why the old rule was firing
every fifteen minutes about nothing.
The 95% critical alert stays a flat threshold. Past rated endurance the drive
is outside what the manufacturer stands behind however fast it got there, and
that alert clears by replacing the drive.
Closes#686
NvmeDriveWearHigh has produced four identical issues since yesterday — #673,
#675, #682, #686 — and would have kept producing them every fifteen minutes.
The alert-monitor deduplicates against OPEN issues, so closing one just makes
room for the next.
That is not a bug in the pipeline. It is a bug in the rule I wrote yesterday:
wear only ever increases, so a `>= 80` threshold starts firing the day a drive
crosses it and never stops. It is a status dressed as an alert, and no
suppression mechanism fixes a rule that is permanently true by construction.
The second half is worse. The drives it fired on are the EPHEMERAL volumes,
worn deliberately — they hold /var precisely because their remaining endurance
does not matter there. The alert was reporting the design as a fault, three
times over, for drives at 81/83/87% that are doing exactly what they were put
there to do.
So the warning goes and the critical threshold stays. 95% is a decision — the
drive is outside what the manufacturer stands behind — and a decision is what
an alert is for. The wear figure itself lives on the Disk Health dashboard,
per drive and with the role attached, which is where a slowly-moving budget
belongs.
The comment left behind says all of this, because the obvious reaction to
"there is no wear warning" is to add one back.
Not done here, deliberately: the noise log (#326) would also have silenced
this, and it is the designed path for an alert that fires continuously without
being repo-fixable. It is the wrong tool here — the alert was fixable, and
suppressing a bad rule leaves the bad rule.
Closes#686
559 -> 509 comment lines. A far smaller cut than the other files, and that is
the honest result: most of this file is per-entry rationale for a declarative
blueprint, where the comment is the only place the constraint is written down.
Everything load-bearing stays, and stays emphasised. Every ORDER MATTERS note
survives — Application before Provider, Application before Provider before
Outpost — because Application.provider is on_delete=PROTECT and getting the
order wrong leaves the blueprint failing to apply with no obvious cause. So do
both "git owns membership, add and remove people HERE not in the UI" notes,
since blueprint apply silently reverts UI edits to those groups. So does the
reason each gate exists at all: code-server runs --auth=none as root over
plaintext HA secrets, and shelly-manager has no authentication whatsoever.
Cut: the derivations. Why the dual-OAuth2 setup was collapsed into one
provider, the full W3C-spec account of credentials:'omit', a paragraph
reconstructing how the music-assistant gate failed. The instruction that came
out of that last one is kept and sharpened into "do not reintroduce a gate in
front of a PWA".
Two stale things went with it. The paperless proxy comment said the ingress
controller "only routes paperless.renner.uno to the outpost service" and named
ingress-nginx as that controller — there is no ingress-nginx left, Traefik is
the only IngressClass. And a leftover instruction to "delete via the Authentik
UI once everything's confirmed working" from a session long finished.
Verified beyond the usual: these comments live INSIDE the embedded blueprint
string, so a broken indent would render fine and only fail when Authentik
parses it. Extracted the rendered ConfigMap's k8s-outposts.yaml and parsed it
separately — valid, and still 74 entries.
Comments only across otbr, trmnl/renderer, zigbee2mqtt-deployment and the
smartctl ServiceMonitor. All four still parse; monitoring-rules still renders.
Each keeps the instruction and loses the investigation. otbr stays disabled with
the condition for re-enabling it — verified partition merge, one OMR prefix, the
Nest routers visible — instead of the paragraph reconstructing how the split
partition was diagnosed. Its socat bridge keeps both dead ends, because they are
what stops someone simplifying it: forkpty needs a socat the image does not ship,
and a sidecar cannot supply the PTY because devpts is per-container. zigbee2mqtt
keeps "never run alongside ZHA, and never start without the restored coordinator
backup or you form a new network and drop every device", and loses the cutover
diary around it.
The ServiceMonitor correction is the useful part. Four monitors carry the claim
that kube-prometheus-stack's Prometheus "selects ServiceMonitors by this label;
without it the resource exists but is never discovered". The live resource has
serviceMonitorSelector {} and podMonitorSelector {} — empty, so every monitor is
picked up regardless of labels. Only ruleSelector matches on
release=kube-prometheus-stack, which is why the same sentence on the disk-wear
PrometheusRule is correct and this one is not.
Corrected here for the monitor I added yesterday, which is where I introduced it
by copying a neighbour. The other three carry the same wrong sentence and are
left for a pass that can check each rather than sed across them.
mdns-relay 122 -> 64 comment lines, mosquitto 131 -> 118. Comments only; the
diff filtered for non-comment lines is empty and apps/home-assistant still
renders 83 objects.
The mdns-relay header was mine, written yesterday, and was the clearest case
of the problem: a seventy-line essay with sections. What survives is what stops
someone undoing it — that the relay must stay unicast because Cilium runs in
tunnel mode without enable-multicast and drops re-emitted multicast, so an
avahi-style reflector cannot work; that python-zeroconf accepts unicast at all,
which is the non-obvious fact the design rests on; that it restores
announcements but not HA-initiated browsing; and that so-bindtodevice=net1 is
what keeps any sibling pod from injecting records into HA's zeroconf cache.
Cut: the problem statement, the Errno 113 symptom, the exposure analysis
weighing what the IoT VLAN could already forge, and a paragraph explaining that
the relay is not what makes HA's listener reachable in-cluster.
mosquitto keeps every warning and loses the reasoning around them. The one
worth naming is the retained-state note: a roll preserves connectivity but not
the retained store, and Zigbee2MQTT does not recover on its own. That is an
operational consequence someone needs before touching the rollout strategy, so
it stays — the paragraph explaining why maxSurge:1 is safe does not.
crowdsec, netbird-ingress, woodpecker-ns, san-network-attachment, cilium-bgp
and the openbao rotation kustomization. Comments only; the diff filtered for
non-comment lines is empty and infrastructure/ still builds.
Every instruction survives, because that is the half worth having: do not
switch crowdsec back to password auth, or a wiped LAPI crashloops the agents
and wedges the Kustomization; do not move netbird-ingress off the rootless
image, or socket-LB stops seeing its traffic and the VIPs blackhole; do not
pin the rotators by digest, or a quarterly job fails to pull a manifest that
was garbage-collected months earlier and looks like it simply did not run.
What went is the incident each was learned from, and one duplicate: the
san-network-attachment header re-derived the provider: host argument that
cephcluster.yaml already makes, so it now points there instead.
Two more stale claims found on the way through:
- woodpecker-ns.yaml described the namespace as holding wp-pg alone with
'server and agent arriving in stage 2'. Both have been running there for
some time.
- cilium-bgp.yaml said each node sources its BGP session from eth0. The
management interface is mgmt0; eth0 was the VM-era name.
infrastructure/ is now 2553 comment lines.
cilium 86 -> 63 comment lines, traefik 71 -> 59. Comments only; the diff
filtered for non-comment lines is empty and both files still parse.
Cilium keeps everything that is a trap rather than a story: that bpf-policy-map-max
and vlan-bpf-bypass each exist in three files with nothing enforcing agreement,
that both take an agent restart, that a full policy map surfaces as a pod stuck
in sandbox creation, and why only VLAN 30 belongs in the bypass list. What went
is how each was diagnosed — the Hubble traces, the manual agent deletions, the
device-by-device walk through `cilium-dbg status`.
Traefik keeps the version ceiling and the reason it exists, and keeps the
CrowdSec bouncer note as an instruction: do not re-attach until client-IP
visibility is fixed and a LAN whitelist exists. It loses the retelling of the
outage that produced that instruction.
The traefik header was outright wrong and is the reason this file was worth
opening. It described Traefik as running "alongside ingress-nginx during the
migration", called ingress-nginx "the default IngressClass" and Traefik
"opt-in via ingressClassName: traefik". There is one IngressClass in the
cluster and it is traefik; ingress-nginx has no deployment and no class. A
reader following that comment would have added an ingressClassName they do not
need and looked for a controller that is not there.
152 comment lines to 125 — a much lighter cut than the previous batches, on
purpose. Most of this file is per-rule security rationale, and that is exactly
the category worth keeping: someone deleting the :8124 rule needs to know it is
the trust anchor for X-Forwarded-For, and someone deleting a gate rule needs to
know it is what stands between an --auth=none editor and the LAN.
What was cut is repetition. Four near-identical paragraphs explained the
Authentik gate pattern once per app, three of them re-deriving that
endpointSelector {} makes a :8080 grant namespace-wide. That warning is now
stated once, at the first :8080 rule, and it is stronger for being in one
place: three apps share that port, so changing any of those rules affects all
three.
The world-ingress and ICMP blocks keep their rules and lose their incident
reports — do not add a blanket fromEntities: world to an endpointSelector {}
policy; ICMP needs an explicit allow once any L4 rule exists and Cilium takes
one type per entry.
Two stale references went with it. Egress-to-world was documented as reaching
"garage S3" and "legacy InfluxDB on VM 108": Garage was retired to nas-1 and
there is no Proxmox left to host VM 108. Both replaced by what the rule
actually grants rather than a list of destinations that has already changed.
Comments only; the diff filtered for non-comment lines is empty, and the file
still passes a server-side dry run.
Comments only — filtering the diff for non-comment lines returns empty, and
both files still parse and build.
cephcluster.yaml goes from 224 comment lines to 76. Kept: that `ceph config`
retains values which merely disappear from this file, so deleting a line does
not restore a default and a live provider change needs `ceph config rm` first;
that osdMaxUpdatesInParallel and upgradeOSDRequiresHealthyPGs are the only
things keeping a rolling OSD change off all three replicas at once; that
`addressRanges` drags the mons onto host networking and ties them to a DHCP
lease; that devices are named by-id because kernel names move between boots;
that the bluestore deferral settings must not be raised again.
Cut from it: the paxos write-amplification measurement down to the byte, the
history of why mon_data_avail_warn was once 20, and a table of every drive
serial in the fleet sitting three lines above the by-id paths that already
name them.
velero-schedules.yaml loses a per-PVC inventory of the home-assistant namespace
— eleven names, which had already been wrong once by two — in favour of saying
the schedule sweeps the namespace.
Two stale claims went with it. Both files said PVC contents are uploaded to
Garage; the BackupStorageLocation reads bucket renner-uno-k8s-velero at
fsn1.your-objectstorage.com, and Garage was retired to nas-1. And the ha-pg
exclusion still explained itself by quoting the comment it had replaced.
242 comment lines out, 91 in, across the four hand-written Talos patches. The
diff touches nothing but comments — filtering it for non-comment lines returns
empty.
Kept, because each changes what someone editing that line would do: select
disks by serial or the installer takes the OSD drive; EPHEMERAL volume config
applies only on first provision and is silently ignored afterwards; the
LinkAliasConfig attempt that left a node with no address on any interface;
kube-apiserver not following a node re-IP; the fallback-network links must stay
v6-disabled or the cluster loses IPv6 egress; the installer image is Image
Factory and not the stock one, and its tag must match the version being upgraded
to.
Cut: how each of those was discovered. The four-equal-priority-routes
investigation, the 30 hours of NetBird probes, the image-GC measurement on
k8s-2 down to the percentage point, the per-extension rationale for the
schematic. All of it is in the commit history and the wiki.
Cut as stale rather than merely long, which is the point of doing this at all:
- k8s-1.yaml opened by saying k8s-2 and k8s-3 are still Proxmox VMs. All
three have been bare metal since neptune's conversion; DMI reports
Minisforum on every one.
- two files justified a disk selector with "Talos and Proxmox do not agree
on that order". There is no Proxmox.
- three files carried per-drive wear figures (87%, 81%, 83%) and one an
exact media-error count. Those are measurements, they move, and a config
file never gets re-read when they do.
- the mgmt0 note explained VLAN 40 by way of which address the k8s-1 VM
used to reach over that port.
One thing removed here has no other home: whether k8s-1's 18 media errors are
historical or ongoing was written up in this file and nowhere else, and #549 is
closed. Tracking it separately rather than losing it.
Config files were carrying investigation write-ups: two ruled-out hypotheses in
the smartctl-exporter securityContext, a twenty-line canonical note on the
Hetzner credential, the history of an alert threshold. That is derivation, not
configuration, and it belongs where it does not rot — the commit message for how
we got here, the wiki for what holds.
The distinction this applies: a comment stays if it changes what someone editing
that line would do — a constraint of the tool, a trap, a pointer to an issue. It
goes if it narrates how a conclusion was reached, restates a measurement, or
justifies a value after the fact. The test is whether the surrounding config
could change and leave the comment quietly wrong.
160 lines out, 30 in. Nothing behavioural changed; both manifests still pass a
server-side dry run.
Alert descriptions were tightened rather than removed. Those are not comments —
they are what someone reads when paged, and an essay is worse there than
anywhere.
This covers only what I added today. The repo has roughly 8600 comment lines
with 88 files over 25, and going further needs the criterion above agreed
first — much of that volume is load-bearing warning rather than narration.
Three ExternalSecrets synced a Secret that nothing reads. Established rather
than assumed, from three directions: every live ObjectStore names
hetzner-s3-creds, no CNPG Cluster uses the legacy inline barmanObjectStore
(all seven run the barman-cloud plugin against an ObjectStore CR), and no pod
in the cluster mounts barman-cloud-creds.
They are almost certainly left from before the plugin migration, when the
inline configuration read a Secret of that name.
Worth stating plainly because it is not merely untidy: seed/{authentik,immich,
paperless}/barman-creds hold a Hetzner S3 credential that is NOT the one in
use. Fingerprint c2c5cf3e against 87954b64 for the live hetzner-s3 path, with
the three copies identical to each other. A valid key with no consumer is
exposure without benefit, so if it is a distinct S3 key it wants revoking at
Hetzner, which only a human can do — deleting our copies does not.
Removing the manifests does NOT remove the objects. All three carry
kustomize.toolkit.fluxcd.io/prune: disabled from the seed->app-KS handoffs, so
Flux skips them during garbage collection by design. The ExternalSecrets, their
Secrets and the three OpenBao paths have to be deleted explicitly after this
merges; git alone leaves them live and orphaned, which is worse than leaving
them declared.
The OpenBao paths deliberately stay until then. Deleting them first would leave
three ExternalSecrets failing to sync against a key that no longer exists, for
no gain.
#397 asked for the opposite: give woodpecker its own path so a rotation of
paperless's credentials would stop silently changing woodpecker's. The premise
does not hold. There is one Hetzner S3 key, and rotating it at Hetzner changes
it for every consumer no matter how many paths hold a copy. A fifth copy would
have bought nothing and made the separation look real.
Seven ExternalSecrets were reading it from four paths — seed/paperless (four
namespaces), seed/authentik, seed/immich, seed/trmnl. They now all read
infrastructure/hetzner-s3, which sits beside the existing
infrastructure/velero-hetzner.
That the four paths are byte-identical was verified rather than assumed, and
without reading them: SHA-256 over the three fields of each synced Secret
returns the same fingerprint in all seven namespaces. The same check says
infrastructure/velero-hetzner carries the same access key id, in a different
shape — a single `cloud` field holding an AWS credentials file.
Velero is deliberately not folded in. Moving it means templating that INI from
these fields, which is worth doing and not worth bundling with a path swap that
touches every database backup at once.
The reasoning lives once, in the paperless manifest, with the others pointing at
it. Repeating it six times is how six copies drift.
Kept from the note this replaces, because it was right and cost someone an
afternoon: the 403 recorded in #397 was a wrong-path error, not missing
permissions. The mount is `homelab`, so the path is homelab/seed/... —
`bao kv list homelab/seed` works with the identity available here.
homelab/infrastructure/hetzner-s3 now exists, copied from the paperless path
inside OpenBao so the value never left it, and fingerprints identical to its
source. Writes turned out to be possible all along: they fail through
openbao.renner.uno with a response the client cannot parse, and succeed against
the Service. That is worth knowing before the next person concludes, as I first
did, that the identity is read-only.
Closes#397
I described the worn drives carrying EPHEMERAL as the dangerous placement,
repeatedly, in the alert text and in the dashboard's caveats. That reads the
volume backwards. EPHEMERAL is Talos's /var and its contents are meant to be
disposable — container images, kubelet state, pod scratch, spegel and Rook's
local state all rebuild. Putting the drives with the least endurance left there
is a sensible destination, not a risk someone should be warned about.
The alert said "a node simply stops when it goes", which is simply wrong. A node
losing /var rebuilds it.
What survives the correction is narrower and checked rather than recalled:
/var/lib/etcd is on that volume too, so losing EPHEMERAL on a control-plane node
costs that member's data. Quorum holds at two of three and the member is removed
and re-added. That is a rebuild, not data loss, and the alert now says so at
that weight.
The fill-level panel keeps its warning but for the right reason: a full /var
stops a node being useful long before anything is lost, and nothing rebalances
it the way Ceph rebalances a full OSD. That is a capacity argument, not an
endurance one.
None of this changes the monitoring — measuring every drive is still right, and
the wear figures are unchanged. It changes what a reader is told the numbers
mean, which is the part that was misleading.
Refs #549
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The exporter reports all nine drives now, so the dashboard shows what it
measures: a worst-wear stat in the status row, wear per drive over time, and a
table of the failure-now signals — available spare, media errors, the critical
warning bitfield, power-on time and written bytes.
Every expression was run against the live TSDB and the label names read off real
series rather than a README. That mattered: the exporter labels devices `nvme0`
and carries model and serial on a separate `smartctl_device` info metric, so
each query joins on (node, device) to pull the model in. A legend on the device
name alone would compare different hardware across machines, which is the same
trap the block-layer panels already avoid.
Wear and damage are presented as different things because they are. The wear
percentage is a budget the drive spends and says nothing about tomorrow; spare
exhaustion, media errors and the critical warning mean something is wrong now.
The caveats panel says so, and no longer claims endurance is missing — it was
missing when that text was written and is not any more.
Also fixes the OSD stat, which still rendered two identical numbers side by
side. The commit that fixed it did not make it into #668 before that PR merged,
so the panel went out in the state that prompted the complaint. It now shows
OSDs down alone; up-but-out is a state rather than a fault and Ceph warns about
it separately.
Refs #549
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Third attempt, and the first two were wrong for the same reason: I kept looking
for the gate in the capability and syscall layers, and it was never there.
Attempt one gave the container CAP_SYS_ADMIN and CAP_SYS_RAWIO with everything
else dropped. It found all three drives per node and could open none of them.
Attempt two added seccompProfile: Unconfined, reasoning that EPERM is the
default action for a syscall an unlisted profile blocks and that the kubelet
runs seccompDefault: true. /proc/1/status confirmed both capabilities effective
and a filter loaded, so the theory was at least testable — and removing the
filter changed nothing.
What settled it was a smaller test than either: `head -c 512 /dev/nvme0n1`
inside the container also fails with EPERM. Reading a block device involves no
ioctl, no capability and nothing a seccomp profile filters. The denial is the
device cgroup, which containerd applies to every non-privileged container
regardless of whether /dev is mounted. Mounting /dev makes the nodes visible;
it does not make them usable.
Kubernetes has no per-device allowlist in a Pod spec — no equivalent of
`docker --device`. So the honest position is that `privileged: true` here is
not a lazy shortcut standing in for a narrower setting; it is the only
mechanism the API offers, short of writing a device plugin. The manifest now
says that, and records what was ruled out and how, so the next reader does not
spend the same two rounds in the capability layer.
The /dev mount loses its readOnly flag with it. smartmontools opens NVMe
devices read-write on some paths, and once the container is privileged that
flag suggests a boundary that is not there.
A device plugin advertising the drives as a schedulable resource is the
genuinely narrower answer and is noted as such. It is worth building when more
than one workload needs raw device access; for a single read-only metrics
exporter it is a component to write, deploy and maintain in exchange for the
same access.
Refs #549
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The exporter deployed cleanly, ran 3/3 with no restarts, answered its liveness
probe, and produced no drive metrics at all. Only smartctl_devices and
smartctl_exporter_build_info reached Prometheus — a green DaemonSet measuring
nothing, which is the failure mode the dashboard's own caveats panel warns
about.
The logs said why: it found all three drives per node and could open none of
them, with 'Smartctl open device: /dev/nvme0 failed: Operation not permitted'.
EPERM rather than EACCES is the tell — it is the default seccomp action for a
syscall a profile does not list. Rather than guess between that and the
capabilities, I read /proc/1/status in the running container: CapEff was
0x220000, so SYS_ADMIN and SYS_RAWIO were both effective, while Seccomp was 2
with one filter loaded. The capabilities were never the problem. The kubelet
runs with seccompDefault: true, so every pod that does not say otherwise gets
RuntimeDefault.
SELinux was ruled out the same way: /sys/fs/selinux/enforce reads 0.
This stays narrower than privileged: true, which would additionally grant every
capability, all host devices and write access to /sys. The tighter option is a
custom seccomp profile allowing exactly the ioctl smartctl issues; that is worth
building if this set of exceptions ever grows, and is not worth it for one pod.
Refs #549
Drive wear has been invisible in every signal this cluster has. `ceph -s` reads
active+clean at any wear level, no Ceph health check fires until a device
actually fails, and the block-layer metrics show throughput and latency but
never endurance. That blind spot is how a set of OSD drives reached 81-87%
before anyone looked (#549, #434).
This closes it for every drive, and it costs a deliberate exception to the
no-privileged-containers rule. The owner made that call explicitly after being
shown the alternative.
The alternative was real and is worth recording. Ceph's devicehealth module
already archives complete smartctl output daily — percentage_used,
power_on_hours, media_errors, critical_warning, available_spare — collected
without any elevated privileges, because the OSD pods hold the device access
already. Exporting that needs no exception at all. It also covers OSDs and
nothing else: three of nine drives here, and the six it misses include the ones
retired from Ceph for wear that now carry EPHEMERAL. Monitoring the healthy
drives while leaving the worn ones dark was not worth a new service.
The requirement comes from the kernel, not from the tool. NVMe health is read
through an admin ioctl on the character device, which is gated on CAP_SYS_ADMIN;
sysfs publishes the controller temperature and nothing more. Swapping
smartctl_exporter for another exporter would not change that, so the header says
so — the thing to re-check one day is whether the kernel grew a sysfs interface,
not whether some other tool asks for less.
The exception is kept to the smallest form that works: no `privileged: true`, no
host namespaces, no hostPID. Root plus CAP_SYS_ADMIN and CAP_SYS_RAWIO, all
other capabilities dropped, a read-only root filesystem, and /dev as the only
host mount — required because Kubernetes cannot hand individual character
devices to a pod without a device plugin. The admission policy that forbids
privileged pods is bound to the woodpecker-ci namespace only, so nothing here
circumvents it; monitoring already enforces pod-security `privileged`.
Two details that would otherwise have made the metrics useless:
The ServiceMonitor relabels the pod's node onto every series. Without it each
sample carries only the DaemonSet pod's IP, which says nothing about which
machine the drive is in and changes on every reschedule — an unattributable wear
figure is most of the value gone.
No --smartctl.device list. The exporter scans and rescans on its own, and a
written-down device list would quietly stop covering a drive the next time one
is replaced. Device names are not stable across these machines in the first
place.
The alert rules deliberately separate wear from damage: a wear percentage is a
budget being spent and warns at 80, while spare exhaustion, a critical-warning
flag or new media errors mean the drive is failing now. Media errors alert on
the increase rather than the total, so a drive that recorded errors long ago
does not alert forever while one that starts failing today does.
The completeness check compares the number of reporting drives against
node-exporter's own NVMe inventory rather than a written-down fleet size, so
adding or removing a drive moves both sides together. A rule that alerts on
nothing looks exactly like a healthy cluster, which is the failure mode worth
guarding.
Dashboard panels follow separately, once the metrics are live and the label
names can be read off the real series rather than guessed from a README.
Closes#549
Co-Authored-By: Claude Bot <claude-bot@renner.uno>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The descriptions I wrote listed the drives fitted today: which model holds which
role, that nvme0 is the system disk on two named nodes and something else on the
third, that a count below three means a drive is gone. All true this afternoon,
none of it true after the next swap — and prose does not get re-read when
hardware changes. That is the same failure this session already found in the
velero schedule comment, in the ci-claude consumer list, and in an instruction
pointing at a deleted file. I built a fresh instance of it while writing about
the others.
The text now describes mechanisms that outlive any particular set of drives, and
points at the inventory table for anything specific. Roles are assigned by serial
in Talos and by by-id path in Rook; a broad `disk.transport == 'nvme'` selector
matches every drive in the box; a drive retired from Ceph is not necessarily out
of service. None of that changes when the hardware does.
The OSD-count panel had the same problem in a worse form, since it was a
threshold rather than a sentence: green at exactly 3. It now reads OSDs down and
out as a difference against ceph_osd_metadata, so growing or shrinking the
cluster does not turn the panel red.
Fixes a claim that was simply false: the inventory description said the OSD
column came from ceph_disk_occupation, and the query never joined it. There was
no such column. It exists now, as a PromQL outer join — the matched half via
group_left, the unmatched half via `unless`, unioned — so drives with no OSD
still appear. Verified against the live TSDB: nine rows, three carrying a
ceph_daemon.
A Grafana `merge` transformation would have been the shorter route and would not
have worked. Merge only combines rows whose shared fields all agree, and the two
queries disagree on `instance` and `job` — node-exporter reports an IP and port
where ceph-mgr reports a node name — so it would have produced twelve rows
instead of nine, silently. Doing the join in PromQL also made it testable before
commit rather than after deploy.
Temperature thresholds are now labelled as generic NVMe limits rather than any
drive's rating, since they are not derived from a datasheet.
Refs #549
The first version graphed throughput, latency and temperature but never answered
"is anything wrong". Establishing that still meant querying Prometheus and Ceph
by hand — which is exactly the work a dashboard exists to remove, and which the
next person would have had to repeat.
A status row now leads: Ceph health, OSDs up and in, Ceph capacity used, and the
fullest EPHEMERAL volume across the three nodes. Each expression was run against
the live TSDB before being written in.
EPHEMERAL fill level gets its own graph too. It was the one number checked by
hand that had no home here, and it is the failure that has no safety net: Ceph
rebalances away from a full OSD, nothing rebalances away from a full /var — the
node simply stops.
The caveats panel gains three things found while answering the question:
Ceph does hold wear for the OSDs, in its devicehealth module and not in
Prometheus. The panel names the command rather than the current value, because a
number written into a dashboard is stale the moment it is written. It also
records that the retired Crucial drives were purged from Ceph's device registry,
so their history is not recoverable either — verified by asking for it and
getting ENOENT.
Talos boots with nvme_core.io_timeout=4294967295, so NVMe commands never time
out. A dying drive stalls instead of returning errors, and the latency panel
goes flat rather than spiking. That inverts what a reader would otherwise
conclude from a quiet graph.
Talos kernel logs do not reach Loki — the only log jobs are Kubernetes pods and
a systemd-journal from elsewhere. I found this by searching Loki for NVMe errors,
getting nothing, and checking whether the collector existed before believing the
zero; it did not. talosctl dmesg is the only source, it is a ring buffer, and
this morning's reboots emptied it.
Refs #549
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Throughput, IOPS, mean operation latency, utilisation, queue depth and
controller temperature for all nine NVMe drives, plus Ceph's own OSD latency for
comparison against the block layer.
Every panel joins node_disk_* to node_nvme_info and node_uname_info rather than
plotting the device name. That is not decoration: nvme0 is the Kingston system
disk on k8s-1 and k8s-3 and the Crucial on k8s-2, so a legend keyed on the
device compares different hardware across nodes and does so silently. The
inventory table resolves the OSD column through ceph_disk_occupation for the
same reason — it follows Rook instead of restating a device list that goes stale
the next time a drive is swapped.
Every expression was run against Prometheus before being written into the JSON,
which is also how the caveats in the panel descriptions were found. Latency is
accumulated-time over completed-operations, so it is a mean with no tail and it
vanishes while a device is idle: absence of traffic, not absence of a problem.
Utilisation near 100% on NVMe does not mean saturation the way it does on a
spindle, which is why queue depth shares that panel.
Temperature is the only SMART-adjacent value present, because it is the only one
the kernel publishes through sysfs. Wear, written-bytes totals, power-on hours
and media errors need an NVMe admin ioctl and no exporter here produces them
(#549). The dashboard says so in a panel rather than letting a green screen imply
a healthy drive.
That gap is worse than #549 describes, and the note records why. The Crucial P3
drives were retired from Ceph because they were worn, and now carry the
EPHEMERAL volume — so the drives with the least endurance left are the ones
holding container state, and they are the ones nothing watches. The measured
write latency already separates them from the Samsung OSDs by more than an order
of magnitude.
Also fixes the add-a-dashboard instructions above the generator, whose third
step told the reader to tick a row off ../DASHBOARD-MIGRATION.md. That file does
not exist anywhere in the repo, so the step could not be followed.
Refs #549
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
review-bot found that this bump reached five of seven consumers: e2e.yml and
ci-scripts-test.yml stayed on the old version. Verified — both still pinned the
previous tag on the bump branch while the other five moved.
The cause is worth more than the symptom. ci-claude-refresh.yml carried the
consumer list twice, hardcoded, under the instruction "keep this list in sync
with the consumers". It was not in sync, and nothing could ever notice: the two
missing files were invisible to the bump that would have raised them and to the
guard that checks the pins agree. They were not drifting slowly, they were
unreachable — no future run would have touched them either.
So both copies are now derived by grepping .woodpecker for a version-pinned
reference. A list that must be maintained by hand is the defect; deriving it
removes the failure mode rather than correcting one instance of it.
The pattern deliberately matches a digit after the tag, which is what keeps this
file out of its own consumer set — its steps run ci-claude:latest, which never
needs rewriting. That makes the exclusion load-bearing, so it is spelled out in
a comment: a literal version anywhere in this file, prose included, would add it
to the set and let the sed rewrite it. The tag-scheme note at the top now says
<claude-version> for exactly that reason.
An empty result is a hard stop. Without it the following grep would be invoked
with no file arguments, read stdin, and hang rather than fail — a pipeline that
never finishes is worse than one that exits non-zero.
The generated PR body no longer claims a fixed "5 pipelines"; it counts.
Both files are also bumped here rather than left for a follow-up, and the order
matters: adding them to the consumer set without bumping them would make the
next refresh see two disagreeing tags and abort with "refusing to guess". That
guard is well built — it simply never saw these two files.
Refs #666
Pipeline 6861 answered the question the staged first step was there to ask.
build-alpine-jq ran on the fork's v1.25.18, unpacked the rootfs, executed the
RUN, and pushed both destinations to the Gitea registry at digest a430c9c6 —
while the seven untouched kaniko steps stayed green in the same run. The
executor behaves the same and the registry auth path is unaffected, so the rest
can follow.
This moves the other seven steps here plus the one in ci-claude-refresh.yml.
Nothing but the image: lines change; no flags, no commands, no credentials.
That leaves zero gcr.io/kaniko-project references in the pipelines.
The per-step note from the first commit is gone. It described a migration state
that no longer exists, and a comment that survives its own situation is how the
velero schedule ended up claiming there was no CNPG cluster in a namespace that
had one. The durable half moved to the file header, where it explains why the
kaniko image is not Google's and why the pin is past the version their repo
ended on.
Also corrects the admission policy's comment, which cited
gcr.io/kaniko-project/executor as the image its exemption was verified against.
Worth being precise about what did not change: the policy matches on the buildx
plugin image only and never on kaniko, so the swap needed no policy edit — which
is exactly why the stale image reference in the prose was easy to miss.
Closes#552
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
#552 concluded that kaniko is terminal and that the nine build steps need
migrating to buildah or BuildKit. The premise is wrong. Google archived
GoogleContainerTools/kaniko on 2025-06-03, but the original authors forked it to
chainguard-dev/kaniko and kept shipping: releases run to v1.25.18, well past the
v1.24.0 the Google repo ended on. Upstream moved, it did not die.
So this is an image swap, not a migration. Same /kaniko/executor, same flags,
nothing else in the step changes. The fork publishes no binaries of its own, so
the image comes from gitlab-ci-utils, which builds it from that fork for amd64
and arm64 with versioned tags — the generic :debug tag exists too and is
deliberately not used, since every other image reference here is pinned.
Verified by pulling the image and running it rather than by reading its README:
/kaniko/executor is at the same path and reports v1.25.18, /bin/sh is a symlink
into busybox, and printf, base64, tr, mkdir and date are all present — the
utilities the auth and tag lines depend on. Anonymous pull works, so no registry
credential is needed for it.
Only this one step moves. A change to this file rebuilds every step regardless,
so a single run puts the new executor on alpine-jq beside seven unchanged kaniko
builds and shows both in the same log. alpine-jq is the smallest context here,
one FROM and one RUN, and the remaining seven plus ci-claude-refresh.yml follow
once this is green.
Two counts in #552 are also wrong and worth correcting there: the pin was
v1.23.2-debug everywhere, not v1.24.0-debug — #551 bumped alpine, not kaniko —
and there are eight steps in this file plus one in ci-claude-refresh.yml, so
nine invocations rather than ten.
Refs #552
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The first draft ended on an open question and proposed a two-VM sandbox to
answer it. That was unnecessary: the question is answerable from the Cilium
source and the agent flag reference, and the answer is negative.
installDirectRoute takes its next-hop as a parameter, and nodeUpdate supplies
GetNodeIP(false), which prefers NodeInternalIP. NodeInternalIP comes from the
Kubernetes Node object; --ipv4-node looks like an override but initFromK8s()
runs after initFromConfig() and overwrites it. --direct-routing-device selects
a device, not an address. The same value feeds the VXLAN endpoint in tunnel
mode.
So cluster-internal traffic is welded to the kubelet InternalIP, and the routing
mode does not matter — tunnel sources the VXLAN from it, native uses it as the
next-hop. That deletes the one disruptive, non-rolling step the first draft
contained. Native routing buys nothing for this problem.
Since cluster-internal cannot be moved, the separation has to come from moving
management services off the node IP, and those do not share a mechanism, so each
is checked separately: etcd moves via cluster.etcd.advertisedSubnets, the
apiserver endpoint is already a VIP whose Layer2VIPConfig carries a link field,
the Talos API turned out to answer on every node address, and kubelet cannot
move because it is the node IP.
The result is four VLANs, but the boundary does not fall where the class names
suggest — kubelet stays with cluster-internal. Stated plainly rather than filed
under management and hoped over.
Recommends leaving the node IP where it is and relabelling VLAN 40 as the
cluster VLAN, rather than moving every node's identity to a new VLAN. Same end
state, and the address the cluster is administered through never changes.
Also records that the Ceph pattern is the only mechanism that fully detaches a
workload from the node IP, and that it is too expensive to generalise to
east-west traffic.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Issue #576 framed this as "give node management its own NIC, and Ceph public
its own VLAN". That is two of four classes, and one of them turned out to be
solved already — Ceph client I/O riding the pod network is correct, since that
traffic is cluster-internal.
The classes are Ceph replication (done, VLAN 49), cluster-internal,
cluster-external and management. Three of the four share mgmt0, which was never
a decision: until the bare-metal conversion there was one NIC.
Each class gets a VLAN; which interface a VLAN lands on stays a separate and
changeable decision. That ordering means the separation survives recabling and
does not need one port per class.
Three of the four are controllable with documented levers. Management is the
InternalIP and does not move — everything else moves away from it, which is
also the direction that never changes the address the cluster is administered
through. Ingress is CiliumBGPNodeConfigOverride's per-peer localAddress, on a
BGP session that has been running for months. Egress follows the output device
under eBPF masquerading.
Cluster-internal is the one that does not resolve. In tunnel mode VXLAN sources
from the node IP with no documented alternative. Native routing is the way out
and its prerequisite is already met — BGP has been advertising the pod CIDRs to
the UDM all along — but whether nodePort.directRoutingDevice moves the next-hop
address or only the interface is undocumented across the three Cilium pages
checked.
So the proposal ends on a question rather than a plan, and the next step is a
two-interface Talos sandbox, not a cable. If the answer is unfavourable the
design changes, not the wiring.
Records what was measured rather than assumed: the BGP session state, that
Cilium's direct-routing device follows the InternalIP (adding a second address
elsewhere left it on mgmt0), that the override CRD exposes localAddress, and
where Ceph's two address families actually sit.
Also states what the split does not buy. Management shares a 10 Gb link and is
not contended; nothing observed is slow because of this.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The rewrite earlier today stated, at the top and again in known gaps, that the
rebuild cannot be driven remotely: management is a tagged VLAN, a maintenance
mode node cannot configure VLANs, so it comes up unreachable and every machine
needs a keyboard.
That is wrong. A maintenance-mode node DHCPs untagged and is reachable at that
address — it is not on management, but it answers, and that is precisely the
address `apply-config --insecure` targets in Step 2. All three bare-metal
conversions were driven that way.
The claim came from #576 and was carried into this document without being
checked against what had actually happened days earlier in this repo. It is the
worst place to put an unverified constraint: a disaster-recovery runbook is read
when there is no capacity to discover that a stated prerequisite is fiction, and
"you need physical access to three machines" is exactly the kind of statement
that changes whether someone attempts a recovery at all.
What survives is narrower and true: MS-01 has no IPMI and nothing here does
PXE, so booting from USB is physical. Everything after the boot is remote.
Also removes the follow-on error from the first correction, which claimed the
switch port change on 2026-08-27 had fixed a reachability problem. There was no
reachability problem to fix. That change is real and useful — a maintenance mode
node now lands in management rather than the fallback network — but it did not
turn an impossible rebuild into a possible one.
#576 still carries the original claim and is flagged in known gaps as wrong.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Step 1 was "tofu: provision the VMs" and there are no VMs. The OpenTofu stack
has no node definitions left — only the uninstantiated proxmox_vm module beside
DNS, object storage and UniFi — so `tofu apply` provisions nothing and Step 2
then has no cluster to form. The document was half-updated: it knew k8s-1 was
bare metal but still treated k8s-2 and k8s-3 as Proxmox VMs, which stopped
being true at the neptune conversion.
That matters more than an ordinary stale doc, because it is the document
someone reaches for when everything is gone — exactly when there is no capacity
to discover that step one is fiction.
Step 1 splits into two unrelated halves: a tofu apply for platform resources
that do still exist, and physically booting three machines from install media.
Step 2 stops calling `bootstrap.sh talos`, which cannot generate a config
(#581), and carries the procedure that actually works — the one
RUNBOOK-baremetal-conversion.md uses. Both traps it hides are now stated: the
whole cilium-cni.yaml cannot be passed as a patch, and the generated
HostnameConfig collides with the per-node hostname. So is the two-stage apply:
a config referencing an interface that does not exist yet hangs the install at
STAGE: Installing with nothing timing out.
Scoped that claim rather than repeating "bootstrap.sh is dead" wholesale — the
flux and wait-apps phases are still used in Steps 3, 5 and 6 and work. Only
config generation is broken, and saying otherwise would have left the runbook
contradicting itself three sections later.
Adds the constraint that decides whether this is even attemptable remotely, at
the top and again in known gaps: management is a tagged VLAN, a maintenance
mode node cannot configure VLANs, and MS-01 has no IPMI. Every node needs a
keyboard and a monitor until #576 puts VLAN 40 native on the I226-V port. That
was true before today and undocumented.
Also records what changed under the runbook recently: the schematic now carries
i915, Ceph's cluster network is a Multus attachment rather than host
networking, and OpenBao runs three replicas that each need unsealing
individually — a sealed server is neither a voter nor a standby, so doing one
leaves the cluster short of quorum.
Disk verification before install is now explicit. Talos enumerates NVMe in an
order that is not stable across boots, the per-node configs select by serial for
that reason, and the failure mode is the installer taking the Ceph OSD drive.
Closes#660.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
At 30h a single missed cycle pages critical, and a single missed cycle is the
normal cost of touching the nodes. Velero moves data through pods, so draining
a node kills whatever upload is in flight and the schedule is lost for that day
— it is not retried. Backup windows run 03:15 to 08:45 UTC, so any rolling node
work overlapping them produced a guaranteed critical alert per affected
schedule.
That is noise about planned work, not signal about backups. It fired for eleven
schedules during the bare-metal Talos upgrade and again today.
60h still catches what the rule exists for. Two consecutive failures is no
longer explicable by one maintenance window. Nothing is hidden in the meantime:
VeleroBackupFailed fires on the first failure regardless, so the first cycle is
still visible — only the escalation to critical waits for a second cycle to
confirm it.
Calibration against the current state: the four stale schedules sit at 46.8 to
48.5 hours since their last success, so the new threshold leaves roughly twelve
hours — exactly until today's runs. If those fail too, the alert fires, which
is the intended behaviour rather than a gap.
Verified: the rule passes a server-side dry run, the expression returns nothing
at 60h, and the same query at a lower bound returns the four affected schedules
with their ages — so the selector is known to match rather than merely silent.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Nodes run v1.12.11, which is the last 1.12 patch — v1.12.12 does not exist.
v1.13.9 is current.
The upgrade path is the documented one rather than a shortcut. Migration is
only tested between adjacent minor releases, and the recommendation is to go
to the latest patch of each intermediate minor. 1.12.11 -> 1.13.9 satisfies
both: one minor step, taken from the last patch of the version being left. No
intermediate hop is needed.
Kubernetes is not forced along. Talos 1.13's support matrix lists 1.36, 1.35,
1.34, 1.33, 1.32 and 1.31, and the cluster runs 1.35.2 — so it stays there
until `talosctl upgrade-k8s` moves it as a separate decision. This was the one
open question before the jump and it is answered from the matrix rather than
assumed.
Deprecations in 1.13 were checked against this cluster, not just read:
.machine.env -> EnvironmentConfig not used
.machine.network.kubespan -> KubeSpanConfig not used
EtcdConfigs/KubeletConfigs protobuf change no consumer in this repo
legacy upgrade API -> LifecycleService still functional; `talosctl
upgrade` keeps working, this
only matters once it is removed
Both the five machine-config files here and the live config on k8s-1 were
checked for the first two, because the running config is generated from a base
this repo only patches and could carry fields the patches never mention.
Neither appears in either.
The removed interactive installer and the dropped `talosctl install` do not
apply — installation here is `talosctl upgrade --image` and Image Factory
media.
Schematic is unchanged; the factory image was verified to exist for the new
tag before committing. The cold-rebuild ISO URL moves with it.
Not applied to any node. Rolling it out is drain -> upgrade -> wait for Ceph
to return to 217 PGs active+clean, one node at a time, as in the 1.12.11 run.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The override existed because the mons share the node's /var with containerd,
and on the VMs that was ~60 GB — 30% free measured image and snapshot churn
rather than anything about Ceph, so k8s-2 tripped MON_DISK_LOW whenever the
image cache filled and GC could not reclaim it (#434).
Bare metal removed the premise. /var is now ~931 GB per node at 7-8% used, so
30% free is a real reserve again and the ~106 MB mon database is irrelevant
against it. Reaching 70% would be a genuine signal about the node rather than
noise about the image cache. The comment still described the 60 GB VM /var and
ended with "BARE-METAL MIGRATION: revisit this", which is now done.
Set to 30 rather than deleted, deliberately. `ceph config` keeps a value that
only disappears from this file: `ceph config dump` currently shows
`mon advanced mon_data_avail_warn 20`, and removing the line would leave it
there indefinitely. That is the trap the bluestore settings below already
document, and the one that crash-looped an OSD during the network provider
change when public_network survived being deleted here.
mon_data_avail_crit stays at the 5% default, and CephMonDiskLow in
monitoring-rules still watches /var directly for the real risk, which is the
node filling rather than the mon growing.
kubectl diff against the live cluster shows the value and the generation bump,
nothing else. Verify after it applies with
`ceph config get mon mon_data_avail_warn` — 30 there is the proof the database
entry was overwritten and not merely edited in git.
Supersedes the remaining half of #503, which was closed as overtaken by the
bare-metal migration.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The pool was .4-.6 because the nodes held .1-.3 for as long as Ceph needed
host networking to reach VLAN 49 — three addresses for three OSDs, with no
spare, during the one phase where things were actually moving.
The nodes have since given those addresses up: the link is only a macvlan
parent now and does not need one of its own. The reservation has nothing left
to avoid, so the pool takes .1 through .6.
Six for three is the headroom the migration could not afford. It leaves room
for a leaked allocation to sit until the whereabouts reconciler collects it —
the case where a node is lost hard enough that the CNI DEL never runs — and
room to add a second OSD per node without touching this file.
Keeping the pool inside the /29 rather than moving it somewhere roomier on the
segment stays deliberate. There is no router here, so an address outside the
/29 is unreachable from anything using one inside it, which is what would
break a future rolling change where migrated and un-migrated OSDs still have
to talk to each other. That was nearly the shape of this attachment and it
would have taken every pool down at the first OSD.
Inert for the running cluster: a NetworkAttachmentDefinition is read when a
pod is created, so the three existing OSDs keep .4, .5 and .6 until they next
restart for some other reason.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The cluster had no IPv6 egress. Pods could not reach the IPv6 internet at all
while IPv4 from the same pod worked normally.
enp2s0f0np0 is nothing but the trunk parent for mgmt0 and ens19, and enp87s0
is unused. Both sit on the untagged fallback network, where by design nothing
is supposed to run — and both were autoconfiguring from its router
advertisements: an fd00::/64 ULA each, plus an IPv6 default route each.
That left four IPv6 default routes per node at identical priority 1024 —
mgmt0, enp2s0f0np0, enp87s0 and lo — of which only mgmt0 has a globally
routable source address. With nothing to break the tie, outbound IPv6 mostly
left through an interface whose only usable source was a ULA.
This is the same argument the file already makes for ens19, where host
addresses on a link that exists only as a macvlan parent are called "never
needed and actively harmful". It was simply never extended to the physical
ports.
How it surfaced: NetbirdRelayMemberDown and NetbirdPublicEdgeMemberDown had
been firing for 30 hours, reading as though the proxies were down. They were
not — every failing target is an IPv6 literal and the blackbox exporter is a
pod, so the probes were failing on cluster egress. The proxies answered IPv6
in 13 ms from a workstation on another VLAN throughout.
Applied to k8s-1 first and verified before rolling to the other two, because
the existing precedent disables v6 on a VLAN *child* while this targets VLAN
*parents*, and mgmt0 carries the address Ceph and Cilium use:
mgmt0 kept 2003:d6:9718:3b02:… and fd40::… unchanged
fd00:: addresses 2 -> 0
IPv6 default routes 4 -> 2 (mgmt0, lo)
failing blackbox probes 5 -> 0
Ceph 217 PGs active+clean, no OSD restart
All three nodes are already patched live; this puts it in git so the next
apply-config does not undo it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was no OpenBao alerting of any kind — no rule, no ServiceMonitor. That
is why today's seal went unnoticed for two hours: the k8s-1 Talos upgrade
sealed the single replica, the ClusterSecretStore went InvalidProviderConfig,
and nothing said so.
Three replicas make this more important rather than less. Before, a seal was a
visible outage that announced itself. Now the service survives one, so a
sealed replica is a quiet loss of redundancy that nothing surfaces until the
next drain takes quorum with it.
Watches pod readiness rather than a seal metric, because there is no seal
metric to watch. OpenBao is not scraped: no ServiceMonitor exists, and its
metrics endpoint needs a token or an explicit unauthenticated_metrics_access
telemetry setting, neither configured. Verified against the running
Prometheus — no bao_* or vault_* series at all. External Secrets exports
nothing usable either, so the ClusterSecretStore going NotReady is invisible.
Readiness carries the signal for a structural reason, not by luck: a sealed
server fails its readiness probe because it can neither serve requests nor act
as a raft standby. Sealed is therefore always not-Ready. The converse does not
hold — a crash or stuck scheduling fires the same alert — but those want a
human too.
Three rules:
OpenBaoReplicaNotReady < 3 ready for 10m, warning. The duration only
ignores ordinary rescheduling; a sealed replica
never recovers on its own.
OpenBaoQuorumLost < 2 ready for 5m, critical. Raft quorum of three
is two, so below that the store is down.
OpenBaoMetricsMissing absent() for 15m, warning. Both rules above are
threshold comparisons, so if the series disappears
they stop evaluating and the silence is
indistinguishable from health.
Verified against the running Prometheus rather than assumed: the selector
matches (the same query with `< 4` returns the series at 3), and the alerting
thresholds correctly return nothing at 3/3 ready. Testing only that it returns
nothing would not have caught a typo in the selector.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
OpenBao ran a single replica. Every node drain took the whole secret store
down with it: today the k8s-1 Talos upgrade sealed it, the ClusterSecretStore
went InvalidProviderConfig, and it stayed that way for two hours because
nothing was watching.
Three, not two. Raft needs a quorum and the quorum of two is two, so a
two-replica cluster tolerates no failures — it would stop the moment one pod
is sealed or rescheduled, which is worse than the single replica it replaced.
Three tolerates one.
What this buys: a drain seals the replica on that node, and raft elects a new
leader from the remaining standbys within seconds. The service does not go
down.
What it does not buy, stated plainly because it is easy to assume otherwise: a
sealed server can neither serve requests nor act as a standby, so that replica
stays out of the cluster until someone unseals it. Scaling removes the outage,
not the manual unseal. For rolling node maintenance the consequence matters —
a Talos upgrade drains all three nodes in turn, so unseal each replica as it
comes back, or the third drain takes the last unsealed one and quorum is lost
anyway.
retry_join is what makes a scaled replica join the existing cluster rather
than come up isolated and uninitialized; without it each new pod would need a
manual `bao operator raft join`. All three peers are listed on every node —
the stanza is a list of possible leaders, a node ignores its own entry, and
listing all three keeps the config identical across replicas regardless of
which pod currently leads. Addressed through the headless service so each
entry resolves to one specific pod.
The snapshot job moves from the plain service to openbao-active. With one
replica the plain service could only ever hit the one pod; with three it
selects any of them, and a raft snapshot has to be taken against the leader.
No affinity was added: the chart already applies a required podAntiAffinity on
kubernetes.io/hostname, so the replicas spread across the three nodes on their
own — verified against the running StatefulSet.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The nodes held 10.99.0.1-.3/29 on enp2s0f1np1 only because reaching that link
required CephCluster.spec.network.provider: host, which is not per-daemon and
put every Ceph daemon on host networking. Rook now attaches the link to the
OSD pods through a Multus macvlan, and a macvlan parent only needs to be up —
it does not need an address of its own for its children to work.
By the rule this segment is built on — Ceph-internal traffic and nothing else,
no router, no other participants — the node has no business holding an address
there either. This is stricter than before, not looser.
The link keeps up: true and mtu: 9000. Both still matter: the parent must be
up for the macvlan children to exist, and the MTU is what the children
inherit.
Not in this commit, deliberately: widening the attachment's whereabouts pool
from .4-.6 to the full /29. That must not land before these addresses are
actually gone from the running nodes, or whereabouts could hand .1 to an OSD
while a node still holds it. Follow-up once these configs are applied and
verified.
Also records the one-time step that the manifests cannot express. Removing
addressRanges did not clear public_network and cluster_network from Ceph's
config database — the same trap the bluestore comment in the same file
describes. The first OSD of the phase A rollout came up on the pod network,
still had public_network 10.2.40.0/24 in the config database, found no
interface in it and crash-looped on "Failed to pick public address". Both keys
were removed by hand. A rebuild from scratch will not hit this because the
config database starts empty; another provider change on a live cluster will.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Puts the OSDs back on the VLAN 49 link that phase A gave up, without putting
every Ceph daemon on host networking to get there.
The cluster network is an OSD concern. Per the Ceph documentation it carries
OSD heartbeat, replication and recovery, and "Ceph Monitors always operate on
the public network". Reaching it through addressRanges required
provider: host, which is not per-daemon — the mons went onto host networking
as a side effect, making a mon's address the node's DHCP lease.
That failure is documented rather than hypothetical. When a lease moved, the
mon could not bind ("Cannot assign requested address") and crash-looped. Rook
detected it and began a failover, but with three mons on three nodes each
holding the mon host ports the replacement could not be scheduled anywhere —
the canary sat Pending on "didn't have free ports". Two of three nodes hit it
during the Talos v1.12.11 upgrade; both needed hand intervention.
Selecting only `cluster` leaves `public` on the pod network, so mons, MDS,
MGR and the CSI pods keep Rook-managed identities and hold no host ports.
That removes the failure mode rather than working around it.
Isolation is not weakened. Rook's Multus prerequisites about hosts routing to
the Multus network apply to a Multus *public* network; selecting only
`cluster` means they do not apply here. VLAN 49 stays Ceph-internal traffic
and nothing else, with no router and no other participants.
MUST NOT be applied before phase A. Verified rather than assumed — kubectl
diff against the current cluster refuses it:
spec.network.provider: Invalid value: "multus": network provider must be
disabled (reverted to empty string) before a new provider is enabled
Second of the two rolling OSD restarts, bounded by the same two settings: one
OSD at a time, only once PGs are clean.
Follow-up, not in this commit: once this settles, the node addresses on VLAN
49 (10.99.0.1-.3) have no remaining purpose and should come out of the Talos
configs, after which the attachment's pool can take the whole /29 instead of
the three addresses it reserves today.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Intermediate state, not a destination. san-network-attachment.yaml is already
in the cluster and stays unused until phase B sets provider: multus.
The detour is forced by Rook's own CRD validation, not chosen:
rule: self == '' || oldSelf == '' || self == oldSelf
message: network provider must be disabled (reverted to empty string)
before a new provider is enabled
host -> multus is rejected outright. It has to pass through empty, and an
empty provider means the default CNI — so addressRanges, which only takes
effect under provider: host, goes with it.
What this costs while it is in place: there is no cluster network. OSD
heartbeat, replication and recovery move onto the pod network and share it
with everything else instead of the dedicated X710 SFP+ link. Slower, and
every OSD restart pays that price in backfill. Not a correctness problem —
the OSDs can still reach one another throughout, which is the property that
matters, and the one a separate subnet would have broken.
The mons do not move here. Rook leaves existing mons on the network they were
created with; they change only on failover, which is deliberate and separate.
Bounded by the two settings that landed ahead of this: one OSD restarts at a
time, and only once PGs are clean again. Expect three sequential OSD restarts
with full recovery between them, and the same again in phase B.
kubectl diff against the live cluster shows provider host -> "" and the
generation bump. The removal of addressRanges does not appear there, because
this resource carries no managedFields and client-side diff cannot see a
field deletion. It is inert either way — Rook does not read addressRanges
without provider: host — but worth confirming after the apply rather than
assuming.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Rook's defaults are wrong for a cluster this size, and nothing here had
overridden them:
storage.osdMaxUpdatesInParallel default 20
upgradeOSDRequiresHealthyPGs default false
Twenty parallel OSD restarts is a small fraction of a large cluster. Here it
is all three, at once, with no gate on PG recovery in between. Every PG goes
inactive and every pool — RBD volumes and both CephFS mounts — becomes
unreachable for the duration. Not a degraded cluster, a stopped one.
With three OSDs at size 3 there is no spare copy to absorb the second
restart, so the health gate between one OSD returning and the next going down
is the only thing separating a rolling change from an outage.
This binds any change that rewrites the OSD deployment spec, not only Ceph
version upgrades. The immediate reason is the pending network provider
switch, which is exactly such a change — but the exposure predates it and
would have applied to any of them.
Lands inert: `kubectl diff` against the live cluster shows the two added
fields and the generation bump, nothing else. No OSD deployment spec changes,
so nothing restarts.
Deliberately separate from the provider switch rather than bundled with it,
so the bound is in place and observed before the operation it exists to
bound.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The pool was 10.99.1.0/24, a separate subnet on the same segment, chosen to
avoid carving up a /29 with only three addresses left. That choice would have
broken the migration it exists for.
OSDs move one at a time, so the cluster runs mixed: an OSD already on the
attachment has to reach an OSD still using its node's host address on
10.99.0.x. There is no router on this segment — by design, it carries
Ceph-internal traffic and nothing else — so a pool outside the /29 is
unreachable from the un-migrated side. The two OSDs would mark each other
down, during precisely the window that is supposed to be the safe one.
Moves the pool into 10.99.0.0/29 with range_start/range_end reserving .4-.6,
leaving .1-.3 to the nodes. That is one address per OSD with nothing spare,
which is sufficient rather than merely tolerable: osdMaxUpdatesInParallel
bounds the migration to one OSD at a time, so allocations grow 1, 2, 3 and
never overlap. Headroom returns after the switch is confirmed and the node
addresses come out of the Talos configs — then the pool takes the whole /29.
Verified: the embedded CNI JSON parses with the intended range and bounds;
the NAD passes a server-side dry run.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Step 2 of moving Ceph's cluster network off host networking. Inert on its
own: a NetworkAttachmentDefinition does nothing until a pod references it,
and nothing will until cephcluster.yaml names it under
network.selectors.cluster.
Why this exists at all: `addressRanges` only takes effect under
`provider: host`, so carrying replication over the dedicated 10G link meant
setting a provider that is not per-daemon. It puts mons on host networking
too, which makes a mon's address the node's DHCP lease — and when that lease
moves the mon cannot bind. Three mons on three nodes then each hold the mon
host ports, so Rook cannot schedule the replacement it just decided to create
and the failover stalls. Both happened during the v1.12.11 upgrade, on two of
three nodes.
None of that serves the goal. Per the Ceph documentation the cluster network
carries OSD heartbeat, replication and recovery only — "Ceph Monitors always
operate on the public network". Attaching it here gives the OSDs the link and
leaves every other daemon on the pod network.
Its own subnet rather than the existing /29. The nodes hold 10.99.0.1-.3 for
as long as Ceph still uses host networking, which leaves exactly three
addresses for three OSDs — no headroom during the one phase where things
actually move, and a leaked allocation from a hard node loss would mean an
OSD without an address. OSDs never need to reach the node addresses, since
the cluster network is OSD-to-OSD, so the pool sits in its own range on the
same segment instead. A /24 for three addresses costs nothing: nothing else
can ever live on this segment, and it takes address count off the table when
OSDs are added.
After the provider switch is confirmed, the node addresses on VLAN 49 have no
remaining purpose and can come out of the Talos configs.
No gateway and no routes, because there is no router on this segment and
there must not be one. That also means no `sbr` chaining, unlike the v30iot
attachments — there is no DHCP-supplied default route to confine here.
whereabouts for IPAM: dhcp needs a server that must not exist on the SAN, and
host-local keeps state per node with no cluster-wide coordination, so two
nodes would hand out the same address on shared L2.
MTU 9000 matches the link. macvlan inherits it, but stating it means a change
to the parent cannot silently halve replication throughput with nothing in
the tree recording the expectation.
Verified: whereabouts from step 1 is running on all three nodes with its
binary installed next to macvlan; the NAD passes a server-side dry run; the
embedded CNI JSON parses and carries the intended master, mtu, ipam type and
range.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
description:"A Velero backup run for {{ $labels.schedule }} completed with Failed or PartiallyFailed status in the last hour. Inspect with `kubectl -n velero get backup.velero.io -l velero.io/schedule-name={{ $labels.schedule }}` and the velero pod logs."
- alert:VeleroBackupStale
# Daily schedule with no successful backup in over 30h: covers
# the case where multiple consecutive runs failed (Garage flapping
# over the backup window) without the per-event alerts being
# acted on.
# Daily schedule with no successful backup in over 60h: covers the
# case where consecutive runs failed without the per-event alerts
# being acted on.
#
# 60h, not 30h. At 30h a single missed cycle pages, and a single
# missed cycle is the normal cost of touching the nodes: Velero moves
# data through pods, so draining a node kills whatever upload is in
# flight and the schedule is simply lost for that day — it is not
# retried. Rolling node work between 03:15 and 08:45 UTC therefore
# produced a guaranteed critical alert for every schedule it
# overlapped, which is noise about planned work rather than a signal
# about backups.
#
# 60h still catches what this is for. Two consecutive failures is no
# longer explicable by one maintenance window, and the per-event
# VeleroBackupFailed alert fires on the first failure regardless — so
# nothing is hidden, only the escalation to critical is deferred
summary:"Velero {{ $labels.schedule }} has no successful backup in 30h+"
description:"Last successful backup for {{ $labels.schedule }} was over 30 hours ago. With a daily schedule that means at least one full cycle missed. RPO is degrading."
summary:"Velero {{ $labels.schedule }} has no successful backup in 60h+"
description:"Last successful backup for {{ $labels.schedule }} was over 60 hours ago. With a daily schedule that is at least two consecutive cycles missed, which one maintenance window does not explain. RPO is degrading."
"description":"NVMe health and performance per node. The top row answers 'is anything wrong'; the graphs below answer 'why'. Panels resolve each drive through node_nvme_info and node_uname_info rather than plotting the Linux device name, because NVMe enumeration order is not guaranteed to agree across machines — the same name can be a different drive on the next node. Which drive currently holds which role is in the inventory table, deliberately not in this text. Endurance comes from smartctl_exporter, whose series are labelled by node rather than by the exporter pod's IP — see the note at the bottom for what it still cannot tell you.",
"description":"Ceph's overall verdict. A HEALTH_WARN is frequently raised by something unrelated to the drives, so read the detail before treating it as a storage problem.",
"description":"OSDs the cluster knows about but which are not up. Should read zero. Counted as a difference against ceph_osd_metadata rather than compared to a fixed number, so adding or removing an OSD does not turn this panel into a false alarm. An OSD that is up but out shows as a Ceph health warning instead — it is a state, not a fault, and it does not belong in a red-or-green box.",
"description":"Raw Ceph capacity in use. The cluster average is the optimistic number: Ceph stops writing when a single OSD crosses the full ratio, so per-OSD headroom is what actually bites.",
"description":"Fullest EPHEMERAL volume across the fleet — Talos's /var. Its contents are meant to be disposable: container images, kubelet state and pod scratch all rebuild. Filling it is still a problem, because a node with no room to write stops being useful long before anything is lost, and nothing rebalances /var the way Ceph rebalances a full OSD.",
"description":"Which physical drive is which, resolved live rather than written down — this table is the answer to 'what is in the machines', so that no panel description has to be. The OSD column is joined from ceph_disk_occupation, so it follows Rook; a drive with no OSD is carrying either the system disk or EPHEMERAL.",
"description":"Rated endurance consumed, worst drive in the fleet. This is the drive's own accounting against what the manufacturer warrants, not a failure prediction — a drive past 100 usually keeps working and starts eating its spare area. Read it for planning; read the SMART table for whether anything is failing now.",
"description":"Rated endurance consumed per drive. The line is nearly flat by nature — wear moves on a scale of weeks — so the useful reading is the spread between drives and the slope, not today's value. Joined to smartctl_device for the model name, because the device label alone is not comparable across nodes.",
"description":"The failure-now signals, as opposed to the endurance budget above. Spare below its threshold means the drive has run out of blocks to remap defects into; media errors are unrecoverable data-integrity failures and should never increment; the critical warning is a bitfield the drive raises itself. Written bytes is the counter behind the wear percentage, useful for projecting when a drive will reach it.",
"description":"Mean service time per operation, derived as accumulated time divided by completed operations. This is an average and will not show a tail — a drive can look healthy here while a small fraction of operations stall. The line disappears while a device is idle, because the denominator is zero; that is absence of traffic, not absence of a problem.",
"description":"Fraction of wall-clock time the device had at least one operation in flight, and the number of operations queued. Utilisation near 100% on an NVMe drive does not mean saturation the way it does on a spindle — these devices serve many operations in parallel — so read it alongside the queue depth.",
"description":"Composite temperature reported by each controller, read from hwmon in sysfs. This is the one health value available without an admin ioctl, which is why it is the only SMART-adjacent series on this dashboard. The thresholds are generic NVMe limits rather than any particular drive's rating — check the datasheet before treating a crossing as urgent.",
"description":"Ceph's own view of the OSDs, for comparison with the block-layer numbers above. A divergence between these and the device latency is the interesting case: it points at Ceph rather than at the hardware.",
"content":"### What this dashboard cannot tell you\n\nThese notes are about mechanisms, not about the drives currently fitted. The inventory table above is the live answer to what is in the machines; nothing here restates it, because prose does not get re-read when hardware is swapped.\n\n**Wear is a budget, not a prediction.** The percentage is what the drive reports against its own rated endurance. Drives do not stop at 100 — they usually keep working and start consuming spare blocks — so read it for planning, and read available spare and media errors for whether something is failing now. Those are different questions and the alert rules treat them as such.\n\n**A green top row is not a healthy drive.** Endurance says nothing about the drive that dies of a controller fault tomorrow, and this dashboard cannot see one coming.\n\nCeph keeps its own wear figures for OSDs in the devicehealth module, which is a useful cross-check but covers OSDs only: `kubectl -n rook-ceph exec deploy/rook-ceph-tools -- ceph device ls`. A drive removed from Ceph is purged from that registry and its history goes with it.\n\n**Roles are assigned in configuration, not by device name.** Talos selects the system disk and the EPHEMERAL volume by serial, Rook selects the OSD by `/dev/disk/by-id` path. Two consequences outlive any particular set of drives: a broad selector such as `disk.transport == 'nvme'` matches every drive in the box, with the installer taking the OSD as the failure mode — and a drive retired from Ceph is not necessarily out of service, and putting a worn one on EPHEMERAL is a sensible destination rather than a hazard — that volume is built to be rebuilt. Check the inventory table for what a given drive holds before reading its wear as urgent.\n\n**A dying NVMe here hangs rather than errors.** Talos boots with `nvme_core.io_timeout=4294967295`, so NVMe commands never time out. Expect a stall, not an I/O error, and expect the latency panel to go flat rather than spike.\n\n**Kernel messages are not retained.** Talos kernel logs do not reach Loki — the only log jobs are Kubernetes pods and a systemd-journal from elsewhere. `talosctl -n <node> dmesg` is the only source, it is a ring buffer, and a reboot empties it. An NVMe error from before the last reboot left no trace anywhere.",
# — so Cilium has been running on its own defaults for those. Router-id
# allocation is the one to watch: if the chart's default disagrees with
# Cilium's, the sessions re-establish.
bgpControlPlane:
enabled:true
# Masquerading exception, not a routing statement: pod traffic to these
# ranges leaves unmasqueraded, so LAN services see real pod IPs. That only
# works because BGP advertises the pod CIDRs, which is what gives the UDM a
# route back. The two settings are one decision and have to move together.
#
# Pod CIDRs are 10.244.0.0/16 and fd10:244::/48 (talos/patches/cluster.yaml);
# the supernets here cover the LAN as well, which is the point.
ipv4NativeRoutingCIDR:10.0.0.0/8
ipv6NativeRoutingCIDR:fd00::/8
Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff
Show More
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
claude-botandClaude Opus 5
k.renner
security-bot
issue-fix-bot