Compare commits

...
Author SHA1 Message Date
claude-bot aac2599e5f docs(authentik): trim the blueprint comments, keep every ordering rule
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci-scripts-test Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci-manifests-test Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/pr-review Pipeline was successful
559 -> 509 comment lines. A far smaller cut than the other files, and that is
the honest result: most of this file is per-entry rationale for a declarative
blueprint, where the comment is the only place the constraint is written down.

Everything load-bearing stays, and stays emphasised. Every ORDER MATTERS note
survives — Application before Provider, Application before Provider before
Outpost — because Application.provider is on_delete=PROTECT and getting the
order wrong leaves the blueprint failing to apply with no obvious cause. So do
both "git owns membership, add and remove people HERE not in the UI" notes,
since blueprint apply silently reverts UI edits to those groups. So does the
reason each gate exists at all: code-server runs --auth=none as root over
plaintext HA secrets, and shelly-manager has no authentication whatsoever.

Cut: the derivations. Why the dual-OAuth2 setup was collapsed into one
provider, the full W3C-spec account of credentials:'omit', a paragraph
reconstructing how the music-assistant gate failed. The instruction that came
out of that last one is kept and sharpened into "do not reintroduce a gate in
front of a PWA".

Two stale things went with it. The paperless proxy comment said the ingress
controller "only routes paperless.renner.uno to the outpost service" and named
ingress-nginx as that controller — there is no ingress-nginx left, Traefik is
the only IngressClass. And a leftover instruction to "delete via the Authentik
UI once everything's confirmed working" from a session long finished.

Verified beyond the usual: these comments live INSIDE the embedded blueprint
string, so a broken indent would render fine and only fail when Authentik
parses it. Extracted the rendered ConfigMap's k8s-outposts.yaml and parsed it
separately — valid, and still 74 entries.
2026-08-28 07:17:25 +02:00
k.renner 45ca838f22 Merge pull request 'docs(apps): trim the home-assistant manifest comments' (#687) from trim-comments-apps into master
ci/woodpecker/cron/alert-monitor Pipeline was successful
Reviewed-on: k.renner/homelab#687
2026-08-28 05:13:57 +00:00
claude-bot c90406cca7 docs(apps): trim otbr, trmnl, zigbee2mqtt — and correct a copy-pasted falsehood
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci-scripts-test Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci-manifests-test Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/pr-review Pipeline was successful
Comments only across otbr, trmnl/renderer, zigbee2mqtt-deployment and the
smartctl ServiceMonitor. All four still parse; monitoring-rules still renders.

Each keeps the instruction and loses the investigation. otbr stays disabled with
the condition for re-enabling it — verified partition merge, one OMR prefix, the
Nest routers visible — instead of the paragraph reconstructing how the split
partition was diagnosed. Its socat bridge keeps both dead ends, because they are
what stops someone simplifying it: forkpty needs a socat the image does not ship,
and a sidecar cannot supply the PTY because devpts is per-container. zigbee2mqtt
keeps "never run alongside ZHA, and never start without the restored coordinator
backup or you form a new network and drop every device", and loses the cutover
diary around it.

The ServiceMonitor correction is the useful part. Four monitors carry the claim
that kube-prometheus-stack's Prometheus "selects ServiceMonitors by this label;
without it the resource exists but is never discovered". The live resource has
serviceMonitorSelector {} and podMonitorSelector {} — empty, so every monitor is
picked up regardless of labels. Only ruleSelector matches on
release=kube-prometheus-stack, which is why the same sentence on the disk-wear
PrometheusRule is correct and this one is not.

Corrected here for the monitor I added yesterday, which is where I introduced it
by copying a neighbour. The other three carry the same wrong sentence and are
left for a pass that can check each rather than sed across them.
2026-08-28 06:59:04 +02:00
claude-bot 14d62f3aa1 docs(home-assistant): trim the mdns-relay and mosquitto comments
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci-scripts-test Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci-manifests-test Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/pr-review Pipeline was successful
mdns-relay 122 -> 64 comment lines, mosquitto 131 -> 118. Comments only; the
diff filtered for non-comment lines is empty and apps/home-assistant still
renders 83 objects.

The mdns-relay header was mine, written yesterday, and was the clearest case
of the problem: a seventy-line essay with sections. What survives is what stops
someone undoing it — that the relay must stay unicast because Cilium runs in
tunnel mode without enable-multicast and drops re-emitted multicast, so an
avahi-style reflector cannot work; that python-zeroconf accepts unicast at all,
which is the non-obvious fact the design rests on; that it restores
announcements but not HA-initiated browsing; and that so-bindtodevice=net1 is
what keeps any sibling pod from injecting records into HA's zeroconf cache.

Cut: the problem statement, the Errno 113 symptom, the exposure analysis
weighing what the IoT VLAN could already forge, and a paragraph explaining that
the relay is not what makes HA's listener reachable in-cluster.

mosquitto keeps every warning and loses the reasoning around them. The one
worth naming is the retained-state note: a roll preserves connectivity but not
the retained store, and Zigbee2MQTT does not recover on its own. That is an
operational consequence someone needs before touching the rollout strategy, so
it stays — the paragraph explaining why maxSurge:1 is safe does not.
2026-08-28 06:55:34 +02:00
k.renner 85b8f0eba9 Merge pull request 'docs(infra): trim the cilium and traefik helm release comments' (#685) from trim-comments-helm into master
ci/woodpecker/cron/alert-monitor Pipeline was successful
Reviewed-on: k.renner/homelab#685
2026-08-28 04:53:37 +00:00
7 changed files with 121 additions and 273 deletions
@@ -25,20 +25,13 @@ data:
attrs:
local: true
# Retired OIDC layer. Paperless's URL-level access is gated by the
# paperless-gate ProxyProvider (below); user identity is forwarded
# from the gate to paperless via the X-authentik-* request headers
# and consumed by paperless via PAPERLESS_ENABLE_HTTP_REMOTE_USER
# (see kubernetes/apps/paperless/paperless.yaml). One Authentik
# Application, one Provider — the dual-OAuth2-flow setup with a
# separate paperless OIDC client + django-allauth callback was
# structurally fine but added a second consent screen on first
# login for no real defense-in-depth gain.
# Retired OIDC layer. Access is gated by the paperless-gate
# ProxyProvider below, which forwards identity as X-authentik-* headers
# consumed via PAPERLESS_ENABLE_HTTP_REMOTE_USER.
#
# Order matters: delete the Application BEFORE the OAuth2Provider
# because Application.provider is on_delete=PROTECT, so the
# OAuth2Provider can't be removed while the Application still
# references it.
# ORDER MATTERS: delete the Application BEFORE the OAuth2Provider.
# Application.provider is on_delete=PROTECT, so the provider cannot be
# removed while an Application still references it.
- model: authentik_core.application
identifiers:
slug: paperless
@@ -49,22 +42,15 @@ data:
name: Paperless
state: absent
# Also clean up the very-early orphan `paperless` ProxyProvider
# left behind from this session's first attempts. It's not bound
# to anything any more, just leftover state in the DB.
# Orphan ProxyProvider, unbound — leftover DB state.
- model: authentik_providers_proxy.proxyprovider
identifiers:
name: paperless
state: absent
# Dedicated forward-auth gate for paperless. This is a SEPARATE
# outpost (its own Deployment + Service `ak-outpost-paperless-
# gate`) running in front of paperless so every request is
# authenticated and authorized by Authentik before it reaches
# paperless's own attack surface. The gate sits on top of, and
# separate from, the OIDC OAuth2Provider above (which is what
# paperless's django-allauth uses for SSO once a request makes
# it through the gate).
# Dedicated forward-auth gate for paperless: its own outpost
# Deployment + Service, so every request is authenticated before it
# reaches paperless.
- id: paperless-gate-provider
model: authentik_providers_proxy.proxyprovider
identifiers:
@@ -73,16 +59,13 @@ data:
attrs:
authorization_flow: !Find [authentik_flows.flow, [slug, default-provider-authorization-implicit-consent]]
invalidation_flow: !Find [authentik_flows.flow, [slug, default-provider-invalidation-flow]]
# Proxy (not forward_domain) so the outpost itself terminates
# the request and forwards to paperless — moving the trust
# boundary off ingress-nginx and onto paperless-gate. ingress-
# nginx now only routes paperless.renner.uno to the outpost
# service; it never talks to paperless directly. The outpost
# is what populates X-Authentik-Username on the upstream
# request, and the NetworkPolicy in the paperless namespace
# only allows traffic to paperless from the gate outpost pod
# itself, so ingress-nginx (or any other in-cluster workload)
# cannot bypass the gate to inject headers.
# Proxy, NOT forward_domain: the outpost terminates the request
# itself, so the trust boundary sits here rather than at the ingress
# controller, which only routes to the outpost Service and never
# reaches paperless directly. The outpost populates
# X-Authentik-Username, and the paperless NetworkPolicy admits
# traffic only from this outpost — so nothing else in the cluster
# can bypass the gate and inject those headers.
mode: proxy
internal_host: http://paperless.paperless.svc.cluster.local
internal_host_ssl_validation: false
@@ -91,19 +74,12 @@ data:
access_token_validity: hours=24
refresh_token_validity: days=30
intercept_header_auth: true
# Pass paperless's entire static-asset tree through anonymously.
# Two reasons:
# 1. <link rel="manifest"> is fetched with `credentials: 'omit'`
# (W3C spec, no crossorigin attr) so the cookie is never sent
# — every page load and every SPA navigation turned into a
# 302 → auth.renner.uno round-trip with an orphan session JWT.
# Same root cause as the retired music-assistant-gate (see
# comment further below); paperless can't retire the gate so
# it carves out the offending paths instead.
# 2. Every CSS/JS/icon fetch otherwise validates the cookie at
# the outpost — pure overhead on assets that carry no
# authentication value. Django's STATIC tree is public by
# design; MEDIA (under /api/documents/*) stays gated.
# The static-asset tree passes anonymously, and must. A
# <link rel="manifest"> is fetched with `credentials: 'omit'` per
# the W3C spec, so the session cookie is never sent and every page
# load turns into a redirect loop through the login origin. Django's
# STATIC tree is public by design; MEDIA under /api/documents/*
# stays gated.
skip_path_regex: ^/static/.*
- model: authentik_core.application
@@ -130,18 +106,14 @@ data:
negate: false
failure_result: false
# Retired: the music-assistant-gate ProxyProvider, Application,
# and dedicated Outpost. The gate fundamentally conflicted with
# MA's PWA model — Chrome fetches manifest.webmanifest / sw.js /
# icons with `credentials: 'omit'` (per W3C spec, no crossorigin
# attribute on MA's <link rel="manifest">), and the cached
# service worker bypasses fresh navigations on PWA cold-start so
# the Authentik cookie never lands in the WebAPK's cookie jar.
# MA has its own auth (delegated to Home Assistant); the gate's
# marginal value didn't justify the recurring breakage.
# Order matters: Application before Provider before Outpost.
# Application.provider is on_delete=PROTECT, so the Provider
# can't be removed while the Application still references it.
# Retired: the music-assistant gate. A forward-auth gate cannot work in
# front of a PWA — the manifest and service worker are fetched with
# `credentials: 'omit'`, and a cached service worker bypasses fresh
# navigations, so the session cookie never reaches the installed app.
# Do not reintroduce one there; MA delegates auth to Home Assistant.
#
# ORDER MATTERS: Application before Provider before Outpost, because
# Application.provider is on_delete=PROTECT.
- model: authentik_core.application
identifiers:
slug: music-assistant-gate
@@ -157,18 +129,13 @@ data:
name: music-assistant-gate
state: absent
# Dedicated outpost: its ONLY job is to serve the in-cluster
# /outpost.goauthentik.io/auth/nginx endpoint that nginx
# auth_request hits for every request to paperless. The
# browser-facing legs of the OAuth flow (/start, /callback, the
# `/if/...` login UI, /application/o/authorize, /api, etc.) all
# need to happen on auth.renner.uno because that's the origin
# WebAuthn/FIDO/TOTP credentials are bound to. So we attach the
# ProxyProvider to BOTH outposts (see embedded outpost below) and
# set authentik_host_browser to auth.renner.uno here too — the
# nginx auth_request happens server-to-server, but if the
# dedicated outpost ever does emit a redirect URL, it points at
# the right host.
# Dedicated outpost, serving the in-cluster auth endpoint only.
#
# The browser-facing legs of the OAuth flow must happen on
# auth.renner.uno, because that is the origin WebAuthn credentials are
# bound to. Hence the ProxyProvider is attached to BOTH this outpost and
# the embedded one, and authentik_host_browser points at auth.renner.uno
# here too — so any redirect this outpost emits names the right host.
- model: authentik_outposts.outpost
identifiers:
name: paperless-gate
@@ -196,12 +163,7 @@ data:
kubernetes_ingress_secret_name: "authentik-outpost-tls"
kubernetes_json_patches: null
# Tear down the leftover paperless-proxy Application from an
# earlier experiment. The orphan `paperless` ProxyProvider that
# used to back paperless.app is left in place — it's PROTECTed
# by Application.provider as long as anything references it, and
# leftover orphans don't break anything. Delete via the Authentik
# UI once everything's confirmed working.
# Leftover Application from an earlier experiment.
- model: authentik_policies.policybinding
identifiers:
target: !Find [authentik_core.application, [slug, paperless-proxy]]
@@ -217,15 +179,11 @@ data:
# ------------------------------------------------------------------
# vscode config-editor gate
#
# code-server (the HA /config editor sidecar) runs with --auth=none,
# as root, mounting the whole HA /config incl. plaintext secrets.yaml
# and .storage. This gate moves it behind Authentik with a passkey
# step-up, mirroring the paperless-gate proxy-outpost pattern above:
# the dedicated ak-outpost-vscode-gate terminates the request,
# enforces the session, and forwards to the code-server Service.
# Traefik only ever routes vscode.home.renner.uno to the outpost; the
# home-assistant CNP is tightened so ONLY the gate outpost may reach
# :8080 (see home-assistant-ns.yaml + vscode-gate-egress.yaml).
# code-server runs with --auth=none, as root, mounting the whole HA
# /config including plaintext secrets.yaml and .storage. This gate is
# the only thing in front of it: the outpost terminates the request and
# enforces a passkey step-up, Traefik routes only to the outpost, and
# the home-assistant CNP admits :8080 from the gate alone.
# ------------------------------------------------------------------
- id: vscode-config-editors-group
model: authentik_core.group
@@ -265,17 +223,14 @@ data:
access_token_validity: hours=24
refresh_token_validity: days=30
intercept_header_auth: true
# code-server is a service-worker app: <link rel="manifest"> and
# the service worker are fetched with credentials:'omit', which
# turned into a /authorize redirect loop and forced the RETIREMENT
# of the music-assistant gate (see comment above). Carve its
# static/manifest/SW tree out so those cookieless fetches pass
# through instead of 302-looping; the editor's actual content
# (the /config tree) is served over authenticated websocket/API
# paths, which stay gated.
# NOTE: the exact skip set is code-server-version-specific and
# MUST be confirmed post-deploy against the real redirect-loop
# behaviour (see the PR validation checklist).
# code-server is a service-worker app, so its manifest and SW are
# fetched with credentials:'omit' and 302-loop unless carved out.
# The editor's actual content rides authenticated websocket/API
# paths and stays gated.
#
# This skip set is version-specific: re-check it after a
# code-server bump, because a renamed asset path reintroduces the
# loop silently.
skip_path_regex: ^/(_static/|manifest\.json|.*\.webmanifest|.*serviceWorker\.js).*
- model: authentik_core.application
@@ -331,16 +286,11 @@ data:
# ------------------------------------------------------------------
# shelly-manager gate
#
# shelly-manager has no authentication of its own: anything that can
# reach :8080 can rewrite Shelly device config, push scripts, and read
# the stored per-device AdminPassword values. Until now the only
# control was reachability of shelly-manager.home.renner.uno.
#
# Same shape as the vscode-gate above: a dedicated outpost terminates
# the request, enforces a passkey step-up, and forwards to the
# shelly-manager Service. Traefik only ever routes the hostname to the
# outpost; the home-assistant CNP allows ONLY this outpost to reach
# :8080 (see home-assistant-ns.yaml + shelly-manager-gate-egress.yaml).
# shelly-manager has no authentication of its own: anything that reaches
# :8080 can rewrite device config, push scripts and read the stored
# per-device AdminPassword values. Same shape as the vscode gate — the
# outpost is the only control, Traefik routes only to it, and the CNP
# admits :8080 from this outpost alone.
# ------------------------------------------------------------------
- id: shelly-managers-group
model: authentik_core.group
@@ -1,80 +1,22 @@
---
# mDNS relay: gives Home Assistant sight of the IoT VLAN's mDNS announcements
# without putting a macvlan on the HA pod itself.
# mDNS relay: holds the multicast membership on the IoT VLAN through its own
# macvlan and forwards each datagram to Home Assistant as ordinary UNICAST UDP.
#
# THE PROBLEM
# It must stay unicast. An avahi-style reflector cannot work here — Cilium runs
# in tunnel mode without enable-multicast, so re-emitted multicast is dropped by
# the CNI. Unicast is carried, and python-zeroconf accepts it: its datagram
# handler checks size and duplicates but never the destination or source
# address. RFC 6762's QU bit makes this protocol-legal rather than a trick.
#
# HA's zeroconf listener joins both mDNS groups on eth0 — 224.0.0.251 and
# ff02::fb — and never hears anything on either.
# Multicast is link-local, so IoT-VLAN announcements do not reach the pod
# CIDR; and Cilium runs in tunnel mode (VXLAN) without `enable-multicast`, so
# it does not replicate multicast between pods either. Both halves of the path
# are dead, which is why an avahi-style reflector — receive on one interface,
# re-emit as multicast on the other — cannot work here: the re-emitted packets
# would be dropped by the CNI.
# This restores passive reception only — announcements, including the
# re-announce a device sends when its address changes. HA-initiated browsing
# still dies on eth0; that would need a querier on the VLAN side, which this
# deliberately is not.
#
# Consequence for HA: the ESPHome integration dials devices at the address
# cached in its config entry. When a lease rotates, every attempt fails with
# `[Errno 113] Connect call failed` and the device stays unreachable, because
# the mDNS announcement that would carry the new address never arrives. New
# devices are never discovered at all.
#
# THE MECHANISM
#
# This relay holds the multicast membership on the IoT VLAN through its own
# macvlan (mdns-relay-network-attachment.yaml) and forwards each datagram it
# receives to HA as ordinary UNICAST UDP. That is the one direction of travel
# the CNI will carry.
#
# It works because python-zeroconf does not filter on how a packet arrived:
# its datagram handler validates size, deduplicates, and parses, but performs
# no check on destination address, source address, or source port. A unicast
# datagram delivered to :5353 is processed exactly like a multicast one. (mDNS
# unicast responses are part of RFC 6762 — the QU bit — so this is within the
# protocol, not a trick.)
#
# WHAT THIS DOES AND DOES NOT RESTORE
#
# Restored: passive reception. RFC 6762 requires a responder to re-announce
# when its address changes, so a device that moves to a new lease announces
# the move, HA sees it, and the ESPHome integration updates the config entry.
# That is the failure this exists to fix. New devices announcing themselves
# are likewise seen.
#
# NOT restored: HA-initiated browsing. Queries HA sends leave on eth0 as
# multicast and die there, so HA cannot actively solicit a response. Anything
# depending on a query rather than an announcement stays broken. Making that
# work needs a querier on the VLAN side, which this relay deliberately is not.
#
# EXPOSURE
#
# The receive sockets carry so-bindtodevice=net1, so only datagrams that
# actually arrived on the IoT VLAN interface are delivered. Binding to net1's
# address instead is not possible — it is DHCP-leased and unknown at exec time
# — but binding to the device achieves the same confinement without needing to
# know the address, and needs no capability: SO_BINDTODEVICE succeeds as an
# unprivileged uid here.
#
# Without it socat would bind the wildcard, and since the namespace CNP grants
# every pod in home-assistant unrestricted access to every other pod on every
# port, any sibling pod could reach :5353 over the cluster network and have
# records forwarded into HA's zeroconf cache.
#
# What remains, and cannot be closed here: any host on the IoT VLAN can send
# this port a datagram. That is the same trust already extended to genuine
# mDNS from that segment, which any device there can equally forge — the relay
# widens who can reach HA's listener, not what can be claimed. macvlan traffic
# bypasses Cilium policy entirely, so the namespace CNP does not constrain
# this interface either way.
#
# Note that the relay is not what makes HA's zeroconf reachable from inside
# the cluster: HA binds :5353 on the pod address (v4) and the wildcard (v6),
# and the namespace CNP already permits any sibling pod to reach it directly.
# Confining the relay removes a second route to that listener; it does not
# remove the first.
#
# Nothing else is exposed: the containers run socat and only socat, with no
# second listener to reach.
# so-bindtodevice=net1 on both receive sockets is load-bearing: without it
# socat binds the wildcard, and the namespace CNP lets any sibling pod reach
# :5353 and inject records into HA's zeroconf cache. Binding net1's address
# instead is impossible — it is DHCP-leased and unknown at exec time.
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
@@ -6,32 +6,23 @@ metadata:
labels:
app.kubernetes.io/name: mosquitto
annotations:
# REQUIRED for credential rotation to take effect at all. The startup shim
# rebuilds /mosquitto/auth/passwd from these Secrets on every pod start, so
# a rotated Secret is inert until the pod restarts — without this the new
# password would sit unused until some unrelated restart, while the old one
# stayed valid indefinitely.
# REQUIRED for credential rotation to take effect. The startup shim rebuilds
# the password file only on pod start, so without this a rotated Secret sits
# inert while the old password stays valid indefinitely.
#
# Listed per-Secret rather than using the blanket `reloader.stakater.com/
# auto: "true"`, so that enrolling each remaining broker user in rotation is
# a visible, reviewable edit to this line rather than something that starts
# happening implicitly.
# Listed per-Secret rather than with the blanket auto annotation, so that
# enrolling another broker user is a visible edit to this line.
secret.reloader.stakater.com/reload: mosquitto-health-credentials
spec:
replicas: 1
strategy:
# No PVC anymore, so nothing to fence: the new broker can come up and pass
# its readiness probe before the old one is torn down. maxUnavailable:0 keeps
# a broker serving throughout an image bump / reschedule (clients on the old
# pod just reconnect to the new one); maxSurge:1 permits the brief two-pod
# overlap — two independent stateless brokers behind the LB, fine since there
# is no shared state.
# No PVC, so nothing to fence — the new broker can serve before the old one
# is torn down. Two stateless brokers overlapping behind the LB is fine.
#
# NOTE: connectivity survives the roll, but RETAINED STATE DOES NOT — the
# new pod starts with an empty retained store, so a roll is equivalent to a
# broker restart for every client that depends on retention. Zigbee2MQTT
# does not recover from that on its own; see mosquitto-config.yaml and
# gitea issue #381.
# Connectivity survives a roll but RETAINED STATE DOES NOT: the new pod
# starts with an empty retained store, so every roll is a broker restart
# for clients that depend on retention. Zigbee2MQTT does not recover from
# that on its own (#381).
type: RollingUpdate
rollingUpdate:
maxUnavailable: 0
@@ -44,14 +35,10 @@ spec:
labels:
app.kubernetes.io/name: mosquitto
spec:
# Runs on any node (no nodeSelector); the mosquitto-iot LB forwards
# IoT-VLAN traffic to the broker wherever it lands.
# Availability: home-critical priority (never preempted, reschedules
# first) + short fault tolerations so a node failure reschedules the
# broker in ~30s instead of the default ~5min. With persistence off there
# is no PVC to fence/detach/reattach, so the broker can (re)start anywhere
# instantly, no longer depends on Ceph being healthy, and rolls without a
# tear-down-first gap (see the RollingUpdate strategy above).
# Runs anywhere; the mosquitto-iot LB finds it. Short fault tolerations
# reschedule the broker in ~30s rather than the default ~5min, which is
# only possible because there is no PVC to fence — so it also does not
# depend on Ceph being healthy.
priorityClassName: home-critical
terminationGracePeriodSeconds: 10
tolerations:
@@ -6,12 +6,9 @@ metadata:
labels:
app.kubernetes.io/name: zigbee2mqtt
spec:
# CUTOVER DONE (2026-07-23): ZHA disabled, the coordinator-backup Secret is
# populated in OpenBao, and Z2M is now the live Zigbee stack — so replicas is
# 1. It shipped at 0 as a safety interlock (Z2M contends with ZHA for the
# coordinator's single TCP session, and starting without the restored backup
# would form a NEW network and drop every device); that interlock is spent
# once the migration is committed. To roll back, set 0 and re-enable ZHA.
# Z2M is the live Zigbee stack. Never run it alongside ZHA: they contend for
# the coordinator's single TCP session, and a Z2M start without the restored
# coordinator backup forms a NEW network and drops every paired device.
replicas: 1
# RWO PVC → single writer; never run two pods against the same /app/data.
strategy:
@@ -39,14 +36,10 @@ spec:
# network_key, the latter extracted from the OpenBao coordinator backup
# as a natural-byte-order int array.
- name: seed-data
# alpine + jq, built by .woodpecker/build-ci-images.yml from
# ci/images/alpine-jq/. Replaces `apk add --no-cache jq` on every pod
# start: tools belong in the image, not installed at runtime.
# Referenced by tag rather than digest — these are our own images.
# DATED tag, not :latest, matching the ci-ansible:2026-04-29 precedent
# in kubernetes/infrastructure/netbird-backup/cronjob.yaml. With
# :latest, rebuilding this base for some unrelated consumer would
# silently change what this init container runs on its next pod
# Our own alpine + jq image, built by build-ci-images.yml. DATED tag,
# never :latest — rebuilding this base for an unrelated consumer
# would otherwise silently change what this init container runs on
# its next pod
# restart, with no diff here to review — and this is the container that
# renders the Zigbee network key. Bumping the tag is a deliberate,
# reviewable act; the cost is remembering to bump it.
@@ -5,9 +5,8 @@ metadata:
namespace: monitoring
labels:
app.kubernetes.io/name: smartctl-exporter
# kube-prometheus-stack's Prometheus resource selects ServiceMonitors
# by this label; without it the resource exists but is never
# discovered.
# Not required for discovery — serviceMonitorSelector is empty — but kept
# for consistency with the other monitors.
release: kube-prometheus-stack
spec:
selector:
+17 -35
View File
@@ -5,25 +5,15 @@ metadata:
labels:
app.kubernetes.io/name: otbr
spec:
# Disabled 2026-07-11 (replicas: 0) after otbr broke Matter.
# DISABLED (replicas: 0). Running otbr broke Matter: its radio is RF-isolated
# enough from the Nest mesh that it forms a rival partition of the same
# network, and the two bridge only over Ethernet — fast enough for a ping,
# too slow for the fragmented CASE handshake, so devices stay discoverable
# while every commissioning attempt times out.
#
# otbr is seeded with the Nest network's dataset so it should join the
# existing partition as an additive co-BR. In practice it does not merge
# cleanly: its SLZB-06 radio is RF-isolated enough from the Nest mesh that
# otbr elects itself leader of a rival partition (or the network re-addresses
# under a new OMR prefix, observed fd5f -> fdd5). The two same-network
# partitions then bridge only over the Ethernet backbone, which carries a
# ping but is too slow for the large fragmented CASE handshake -- every
# Matter device stays mDNS-discoverable while CASE times out. Removing otbr
# re-merges the mesh onto the Nest hubs and Matter recovers.
#
# This is NOT a diagnosis of a specific config bug: the DHCP/sbr routing
# changes (19a4482, df61407) were investigated and matter-server's IPv6 path
# to the mesh works (reaches devices, ping ok); sbr's v6 table 100 is an
# inert orphan and otbr's eth0 default is outranked by net1's pref-high RA
# default. The instability is at the Thread partition layer. Re-enable only
# after the co-BR integration is verified to MERGE (one partition, one OMR,
# otbr's router table shows the Nest routers) instead of split.
# The instability is at the Thread partition layer, not in the config below.
# Re-enable only once co-BR integration is verified to MERGE: one partition,
# one OMR prefix, and the Nest routers visible in otbr's router table.
replicas: 0
strategy:
type: Recreate
@@ -46,25 +36,17 @@ spec:
# (slzb-thread.renner.uno). Dropping the workload-class=pinned
# toleration lets the edge taint keep it off the tiny edge box.
containers:
# The Thread RCP lives on a SLZB-06 over Ethernet at
# slzb-thread.renner.uno:6638 (Serial-over-IP). otbr-agent's
# spinel transport supports `spinel+hdlc+forkpty://<exec>?<args>`
# which forks an exec whose stdio becomes the spinel-HDLC
# transport, but the upstream openthread/otbr image does NOT
# ship socat (or any TCP-stream tool), so that URL form ends in
# silent ENOENT and otbr-agent dies right after logging the
# radio URL.
# The Thread RCP is a network-attached radio (Serial-over-IP), so the
# spinel transport needs a TCP-to-PTY bridge. Two obvious approaches
# do not work and should not be retried:
#
# A sidecar socat won't work either: each container has its own
# devpts namespace, so a PTY (e.g. /dev/pts/0) created in a
# sibling container is invisible from this container — a shared
# emptyDir symlink to /dev/pts/0 is dangling.
# - `spinel+hdlc+forkpty://` needs socat, which the upstream image
# does not ship; the URL fails with a silent ENOENT and otbr-agent
# dies right after logging it.
# - A sidecar cannot provide it either: devpts is per-container, so
# a PTY created next door is invisible here and the symlink dangles.
#
# The bridge has to live in the otbr container's own namespace.
# Install socat at startup via apt (Ubuntu 18.04 base, no egress
# restrictions on this namespace), run it in the background as
# the spinel-HDLC TCP↔PTY bridge, then exec the upstream
# entrypoint with RADIO_URL pointing at the PTY symlink.
# Hence socat is installed at startup and run inside this container.
- name: otbr
image: openthread/otbr:latest
command:
+8 -13
View File
@@ -1,20 +1,15 @@
# Headless renderer: screenshots the Home Assistant e-ink dashboard,
# dithers it to 16 greys and hands it to Terminus.
#
# Upstream ships this as a Home Assistant add-on. Our HA is a plain
# container with no Supervisor, so it runs standalone here instead —
# viable because the app prefers HOME_ASSISTANT_URL/ACCESS_TOKEN env
# vars over /data/options.json and authenticates with an ordinary
# long-lived token. SUPERVISOR_TOKEN is deliberately NOT set: it only
# flips an internal isAddOn flag, and setting it would switch the app
# to add-on behaviour (fixed port, /data assumptions).
# Upstream ships this as a Home Assistant add-on; it runs standalone here
# because the app prefers the env vars over /data/options.json. Do NOT set
# SUPERVISOR_TOKEN — it flips an internal isAddOn flag and switches the app to
# add-on behaviour (fixed port, /data assumptions).
#
# DIRECTION OF TRAVEL, which is the non-obvious part: with the
# byos-hanami webhook in `uri` delivery mode the renderer does NOT
# push image bytes. It POSTs a URL pointing at its own /output/<file>
# endpoint, and TERMINUS FETCHES THE IMAGE BACK from it. That is why
# both live in this namespace — the pull is intra-namespace and is
# already permitted by the default-deny-ingress rule.
# DIRECTION OF TRAVEL, the non-obvious part: in `uri` delivery mode the
# renderer does not push image bytes. It POSTs a URL to its own /output/<file>
# and Terminus fetches the image back. Both therefore live in this namespace,
# where that pull is already permitted.
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata: