diff --git a/kubernetes/apps/paperclip/cluster-view-rbac.yaml b/kubernetes/apps/paperclip/cluster-view-rbac.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..3e68be55
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kubernetes/apps/paperclip/cluster-view-rbac.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+---
+# Cluster-wide READ for the agents in the paperclip pod (REN-111, decided on
+# REN-52 2026-09-25 by the owner, option B).
+#
+# WHAT THIS IS
+#
+# One ClusterRoleBinding. It binds the Kubernetes built-in `view` ClusterRole to
+# the ServiceAccount that REN-36 created in `../paperclip/prometheus-read-rbac.yaml`.
+# No new ServiceAccount, no new ClusterRole, no write verb anywhere. `view` is
+# maintained upstream and holds get/list/watch only; revocation is deleting this
+# one object.
+#
+# WHY IT IS A SEPARATE FILE
+#
+# `prometheus-read-rbac.yaml` is deliberately narrow and its header argues for
+# staying that way. This grant is the opposite in character — cluster-wide,
+# every namespace — so it is kept in its own file and its own kustomization
+# entry. Reverting it is deleting this file and one line from
+# `kustomization.yaml`; nothing in the REN-36 path is touched, and the token
+# falls back to `get services/proxy` on two named Services.
+#
+# WHY THE OWNER WANTED IT
+#
+# REN-108 part B had to validate a CiliumNetworkPolicy allowlist whose selector
+# was `app.kubernetes.io/name: prometheus-blackbox-exporter`, and could not:
+# kube-state-metrics here does not export `kube_pod_labels`, and
+# blackbox-exporter is not a scrape target so Prometheus has no
+# `__meta_kubernetes_pod_label_*` for it either. A CNP selector that matches no
+# pod allows nothing and reports no error, so the proposal shipped unverified.
+# `list pods` closes that, and the same gap recurs on every netpol or
+# scrape-selector change.
+#
+# WHAT IT COSTS — ACCEPTED ON REN-52, NOT DISCOVERED HERE
+#
+#   * EVERY process in the paperclip pod can read the mounted token, so this is
+#     a grant to every agent, not to one. REN-36 was approved on the premise
+#     that "the token is only worth what this Role grants"; this file changes
+#     that arithmetic, and the owner priced it knowingly.
+#   * `view` reads ConfigMaps in EVERY namespace. This repo keeps application
+#     configuration in ConfigMaps. Chosen over Hermes' narrower alternative.
+#   * `view` grants `pods/log`, which surfaces anything an application prints,
+#     including credentials it prints by mistake.
+#
+# WHAT IT DOES NOT GRANT
+#
+#   * Secrets. `view` excludes them. "Secrets, metadata only" was the original
+#     ask and is NOT expressible in Kubernetes RBAC — the authorizer has no
+#     field-level verb — so that part of the ask is dead. Do not re-add Secrets
+#     here to approximate it.
+#   * Any write verb, on anything.
+#   * ClusterRoles and RoleBindings: `view` excludes the whole
+#     `rbac.authorization.k8s.io` group, on purpose, so a holder cannot read the
+#     shape of its own cage or find a Role to escalate through.
+#
+# FLUX CRDs — COVERED BY AGGREGATION, NO EXTRA ClusterRole NEEDED
+#
+# REN-52 pre-approved adding a read-only ClusterRole for the Flux CRDs *if*
+# aggregation did not already cover them. It does, so none is added:
+# `flux-view-flux-system` carries `rbac.authorization.k8s.io/aggregate-to-view:
+# "true"` and lists get/list/watch on `*` across all six API groups —
+# `../../clusters/homelab/flux-system/gotk-components.yaml:232-254`. The
+# aggregation controller merges those rules into `view` itself, so this one
+# binding picks up kustomizations, helmreleases, gitrepositories, imagepolicies,
+# imagerepositories and imageupdateautomations. Read from git, not from a live
+# ClusterRole — `view` cannot read ClusterRoles, so it is unverifiable from
+# inside the pod. The post-merge SelfSubjectAccessReview on REN-111 proves
+# whether aggregation actually fired in the cluster; if `list kustomizations`
+# comes back `allowed: false` there, the pre-approved ClusterRole is the fix.
+#
+# PRODUCTION
+#
+# Adding a ClusterRoleBinding mutates no workload, restarts no Pod and moves no
+# traffic. RBAC is evaluated per request, so the grant takes effect on the
+# already-mounted token with no remount and no rollout. That sequencing was the
+# point of REN-52 putting this after REN-36: the paperclip Deployment restart
+# was paid once, by REN-36, and is already paid.
+apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
+kind: ClusterRoleBinding
+metadata:
+  name: paperclip-cluster-view
+  labels:
+    app.kubernetes.io/name: paperclip
+roleRef:
+  apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
+  kind: ClusterRole
+  # Built-in, shipped by kube-controller-manager's default RBAC bootstrap. Not
+  # defined in this repo and must not be: it is auto-reconciled, so a local copy
+  # would be overwritten on every apiserver start.
+  name: view
+subjects:
+  - kind: ServiceAccount
+    name: paperclip-prometheus-read
+    # A ClusterRoleBinding has no namespace of its own, so this is the only
+    # place the subject's namespace can be stated. Omit it and the binding
+    # resolves to no subject and fails closed, looking identical to a missing
+    # grant.
+    namespace: paperclip
diff --git a/kubernetes/apps/paperclip/kustomization.yaml b/kubernetes/apps/paperclip/kustomization.yaml
index f08c0722..52f5e729 100644
--- a/kubernetes/apps/paperclip/kustomization.yaml
+++ b/kubernetes/apps/paperclip/kustomization.yaml
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ resources:
   - scheduled-backup.yaml
   - pvc.yaml
   - prometheus-read-rbac.yaml
+  - cluster-view-rbac.yaml
   - paperclip.yaml
   - gate-service.yaml
   - ingress.yaml
diff --git a/kubernetes/apps/paperclip/prometheus-read-rbac.yaml b/kubernetes/apps/paperclip/prometheus-read-rbac.yaml
index 10d67880..f7766a57 100644
--- a/kubernetes/apps/paperclip/prometheus-read-rbac.yaml
+++ b/kubernetes/apps/paperclip/prometheus-read-rbac.yaml
@@ -23,10 +23,20 @@
 # ONE VERB, NAMED SERVICES ONLY — ON PURPOSE
 #
 # Every process in the paperclip pod can read the mounted ServiceAccount token,
-# so the token is only worth what this Role grants. It grants `get` on the two
-# Services named below and nothing else. Widening it is a new card and a new
-# review, not an edit here — the Alertmanager name was added that way (REN-95,
-# for read-only alert-delivery checks; parent REN-94).
+# so the token is worth the sum of everything bound to this ServiceAccount. This
+# Role's own share of that is `get` on the two Services named below and nothing
+# else. Widening it is a new card and a new review, not an edit here — the
+# Alertmanager name was added that way (REN-95, for read-only alert-delivery
+# checks; parent REN-94).
+#
+# THIS IS NO LONGER THE ONLY GRANT ON THIS ServiceAccount
+#
+# `cluster-view-rbac.yaml` in this directory binds the built-in `view`
+# ClusterRole to the same ServiceAccount, cluster-wide (REN-111, owner-approved
+# on REN-52). So reading this file alone now understates what the token can do:
+# it also carries get/list/watch on most namespaced resources in every
+# namespace, including ConfigMaps and `pods/log`. Still no Secrets and still no
+# write verb. Read both files.
 #
 # `resourceNames` is matched verbatim by the authorizer, not as a selector:
 # `svc`, `svc:9090` and `http:svc:9090` are three different strings. Only the
@@ -46,10 +56,14 @@ metadata:
 # second grant, the name is a lie and the review should say so. Whether the
 # token is mounted is decided on the pod (`paperclip.yaml`), not here.
 #
-# REN-95 stretched the name: it now also proxies to Alertmanager. Kept as-is
-# deliberately — `serviceAccountName` is in the pod template, so renaming it
-# would restart the paperclip Deployment and evict running agents. Read the name
-# as "read-only kube-prometheus-stack access", and read the Role for the truth.
+# REN-95 stretched the name: it now also proxies to Alertmanager. REN-111 broke
+# it outright — this account now also holds cluster-wide `view`, which is not
+# Prometheus and not read of one thing. Kept as-is deliberately, and REN-52
+# ruled it stays: `serviceAccountName` is in the pod template, so renaming it
+# would restart the paperclip Deployment and evict running agents, which is a
+# larger production cost than a misleading name. Read the name as "the paperclip
+# pod's read-only cluster identity", and read this file plus
+# `cluster-view-rbac.yaml` for the truth.
 ---
 apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
 kind: Role